20 reviews
December, 2008
In many ways, the SC-BT100 is a better Blu-ray-enabled home-theater-in-a-box than the Samsung HT-BD2. But for its price, you may be better off investing in a component kit instead.
Now that Blu-ray has emerged as the de facto standard for the HD disc format, it's just a matter of time before it's adopted in mainstream PCs, notebooks and home theater systems. We've seen Samsung taking the lead with its S$2,399 (US$1,628. HT-BD2...
Blu-ray without the bother
Picture quality, features, looks, ease of use, Profile 1.1
Sound quality, expensive, rear speakers are extra
The SC-BT100 offers amazing pictures, generous features and Profile 1.1 is a real bonus, but disappointing sound quality and the prohibitive price let the side down
Panasonic has only made the SC-BT100 a 3.1-channel system as standard, which means you need to add optional wireless rear speakers (SB-HS100A) to make up a 5.1 or 7.1 channel system (the norm for Blu-ray discs) which bumps the price up to a...
It's the world's first Profile 1.1 Blu-ray home cinema system, and Danny's on hand to scrutinise it.
There's no denying the sheer quality of the SC-BT100, which dazzles with a superb feature list, sublime hi-def picture quality and a satisfying sound performance. On the downside, it's a shame that it's not a 5.1 system as standard, as having to fork out
Panasonic's SC-BT100 Blu-ray home cinema in a box system has been arousing a lot of interest on our Forums, so we thought it was time to try it out
A thoughtful and fairly neat solution - but sound quality is as important a part of the cinema experience as picture quality
Extensive specification; fine Blu-ray images and effective DVD upscaling too
Sound is unyieldingly hard; conspicuous speakers
The SC-BT100, Panasonic, is a compact system opens the doors to video and audio HD.
-- The all-in-one concept - Compatibility Profile 1.1 BD - HD audio decoders - General Equipment (iPod, SD slot, RF, etc.).
-- What results in wireless with its uncompressed HD?
Showing 1 - 6 of 6 in English
Users who looked at this also looked at:
loading...
loading...
loading...