Call of Duty: World at War Expert Reviews

The odds have always been stacked against Call of Duty: World at War. This sequel revisits an undeniably exhausted FPS setting-World War II-and wasn't designed by series creator Infinity Ward, but Treyarch has delivered a sufficiently compelling ...

Lengthy single-player campaign is engaging ; fun co-op mode

Unimpressive AI ; tired setting ; makes us long for Call of Duty 4

Just don't expect much resistance from the AI enemies. Your foes are easily dispatched and don't react realistically in combat; the concept of suppressing fire, for example, is nonexistent. Waves of enemy grunts will perform kamikaze rushes or snipe ...

Does a change of venue make it a unique game? I don't know, there've been other Pacific Theater games, although the stuff on the Ost Front are a little slim--multiplayer-only held again...

follow that pattern. The World War 2 visuals and cutscenes are beautiful, the motion-centric game play is fun (especially with the Wii Zapper), and the action is nonstop. There's also a fun online component. World at War might just be the first-person ...

Beautiful visuals and cutscenes. Makes good use of the Wii Zapper. Polished feel

Control style can be finicky. Quirky multiplayer format will take some getting used to

Call of Duty: World at War is one of the best, most polished first-person shooters available for the Wii.

It's back to the past for the latest instalment of the Call of Duty series

World at War is definitely one of the series' highlights

The explosive opening sequence in Call of Duty World At War signals the beginning of an emotional and thrilling ride through some of World War II's Pacific and Eastern Europe campaigns. We've taken a different approach than usual to writing this ...

Cinematic visuals and soundtrack ; Great A.I makes it a rewarding challenge ; Brilliant co-op and multiplayer modes

Extremely tough in places

One of the best shooters this year, Call of Duty: World At War is an explosive and powerful cinematic experience.

call of duty: world at war review: World at War brings proven Call of Duty mechanics back to WWII with great success.

Gritty, exciting story, Same excellent multiplayer system, Four-player cooperative campaign, Bayonets and flamethrowers, Nazi Zombies

Familiar setting, Familiar game mechanics, Familiar guns

World at War brings proven Call of Duty mechanics back to WWII with great success.

After the excellent Call of Duty 4, the series jumps back to WWII with surprising results.

To call it Call of Duty 4 with a World War II skin is insulting to Treyarch because Call of Duty: World at War is so much more than that. It's a great follow up to Modern Warfare and proves that World War II is still a viscerally charged conflict to ...

order as much as possible from the heavily consumed out scenario, the player heats up this time not only the digital Germans, but also fired Japanese forces in the Pacific - such as with a flamethrower. In the sixth of 15 missions, we must say, three mort...

Whether you are the 439th Time against the Germans and Japanese in the battle, as long as it's fun. And CoD 5 makes a lot of fun just fucking ..

Call of Duty 4 beat like a bomb - even in the truest sense of the word, because Infinity Ward delivered a faultless game with crackling tension, plenty of action and promising scenario. And because Infinity Ward just two years for a new Call of Duty needs...

Convincing KISehr good PraesentationDichte AtmosphaereExzellenter multiplayer ModusKoop with four players off-and online Toller soundtrack voice may be heard

WWII-topic Very briefly ... self y: x = 1 is not geradlinigerZusammenhanglose juxtaposition of SchauplaetzenDespawn produce with the help of certain innovations in the gameplay PunktenKeinerlei mission design is now very ausgelutscht

I have the game for his naivete with less than 80 abstrafen, but that would not work correctly. Sure, the singleplayer is in every point is extremely disappointing. Berlin, Stalingrad, the Pacific and how hot they all are there in every C-game to see. Tha...