- Daytime rendering, - Detailed image (digitalversus.com)
High resolution, easy to set up (photographypress.co.uk)
alaTest Review Summary
We have collected and analysed 8 expert reviews and 9 user reviews from international sources. The alaScore™ for this product is 95/100 = Excellent. Experts rate this product 74/100 and users rate it 51/100. The average review date is February 4, 2008. We have compared these reviews to 16446 reviews from other Webcams. Last update: December 2, 2008.
This webcam, intended to be in the high end, lacks quite a bit of quality compared to its main rivals. Our biggest problems are the lack of autofocus and rather mediocre rendering in low light conditions.
- Daytime rendering, - Detailed image
- No autofocus, - Night-time rendering, - Wobbly on a laptop
High resolution, easy to set up
Expensive
This high-resolution webcam offers great image quality and a fast recording rate, just make sure you're broadband connection is fast enough to match
Philips is billing the SPC1300NC, as offering "professional quality" images, ...
Laut einer Studie des Microsoft-Online-Dienstes MSN nimmt die Nutzung von Instant-Messaging-Clients
Disappointing quality and performance
I bought this after reading some reviews ( and having used a couple of high-end Logitech webcams) and had high hopes... unfortunately I have been very disappointed. \n \nIt's touted as having upto 90fps, which is only possible at low resolution, it only a...
Super Weitwinkel-WebCam
Ich habe die Kamera speziell für Aufnahmen in einer Sporthalle gekauft. \n \nDie Installation am PC und am Laptop verliefen problemlos. Auch ein erster Test brachte super Videos auch bei schlechten Lichtverhältnissen. \n \nDer erste Test in der Sporthalle...
Alles Bestens! Die Bildqualitaet ist toll & die Videoqualitaet dank der Bildschnelle spitze
Ich hatte selten eine so gute Webcam. Sie eignet sich hervorragend fuer Skype und Co. Sie genuegt echten Profianspruechen, denn sie nimmt auch rasche Bewegungen schnell auf. Von Treiberproblemen keine Spur!
Users who looked at this also looked at:
loading...
loading...
loading...