Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Champion Cooler AD1C7112

Champion Cooler AD1C7112
alaAverage 4.2

5 reviews

Apr, 2018

alaTest has collected and analyzed 5 reviews of Champion Cooler AD1C7112. The average rating for this product is 4.2/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Air Conditioning for all reviews.

On average, users rate this product 84/100.

Review analysis

(Based on 5 reviews)

User Reviews  


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 5 of 5 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (

Very Good Evaporative Cooler


Put it in as a DIY, and while it requires a sturdy base, the cool air output was/is outstanding. Much more efficient that the traditional wet box; time will tell how the separate wet section holds up, but it just makes sense to have it all in plastic....

Jun, 2011

Consumer review (

Good specs, poor quality


Unit arrived with a few minor dents from shipping. After hauling it up on the roof and installing it I found that the blower unit had a big dent in it and had been installed in the cabinet crooked. Also, the squirrel cage was misaligned in the housing...

May, 2011

Consumer review (

Mastercool Swamp Cooler Wow


I highly recommend the Mastercool evaporative coolers such as the ADA7112. This unit will be the one I will save for and purchase as a replacement unit, due to the fact that it has more features than my current Champion evaporative cooler that needs...

Aug, 2010

Consumer review (

MasterCool Evaporative Cooler a Top Notch Unit


Wonderful unit - far superior to the model it replaced. (and worth the extra $600). Much quieter and the thermostat is great - slows the fan down when the set temperature is being reached - and speeds it up as needed. When temperature setting is met,...

Apr, 2010

Consumer review (

Keeping cool a t graet price


Bought and used for home project and works well. Realitvly quiet and energy efiecent, used less energy than last one and worked much faster, would recomend to anyone

Aug, 2009