Bushnell StealthView, 166 x 102 x 57 mm, 573 g, AA Reviews

Consumer review by: Wendell Lynn (amazon.com)

no good

i do not recamind this produck it is not as goos as my older bushnell night monos

Jun, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review by: EuroHunter (amazon.com)

Disappointed

I cannot recommend this product. The black and white low resolution display is the biggest disadvantage of the unit. Firstly, it will take your eye several minutes to get used to the dark after getting white light from the display to your eye. When...

Mar, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review by: cj7hawk (shopping.com)

Compares reasonably to older 1st Generation NV.

Not a bad product for the scope, but the hype about being better than Gen2 really is exaggerated. Firstly, the resolution is about 400x300 pixels. Count em - it's not hard, just takes patience. That's like old Analogue TV - still very good, but older...

Cheap, well made, easy to use and fun

Can't really compete with a decent Gen2

Oct, 2008

Read the full review

Consumer review by: T. Hofmann (amazon.com)

Amazing especially for the price.

I was at first always kind of worried about getting a night optics thinking that it was just some expensive mockery that wasn't worth the money. Well I decided to buy this and just go for it, and was out right amazed and impressed. In complete darkness...

Mar, 2008

Read the full review

Consumer review by: John Godwin (amazon.com)

Impressive performance but not cheap

Bushnell Digital Stealth View 5x42 w/ Super Charged Infrared Monocular I purchased this scope in Canada; oddly enough when I went to order it from a US website they would not ship it here. The image is very bright and can be a bit blinding in a dark...

Feb, 2008

Read the full review

Consumer review by: carpenoctum794 (shopping.com)

Its Great!

What a great piece of equipment!Turns night into day!I tried it out the night I picked it up.It works great!I went to the lake by my house.It was pitch black out.I turned it on and was amazed by what I could see.I could clearly make out a duck that was...

Fair Price..$399.00 Quality build,easy to operate,user friendly

Drains batteries fairly quickly!Buy batteries in bulk

Jan, 2008

Read the full review

Consumer review by: dan2120 (shopping.com)

Last review = RUBBISH

I sell nightvision and for a while the biggest problem was ensuring the customer wasn't expecting to own what he saw in the last action movie he went to see.

Excellent Resolution, cheap for the performance, TV/VIDEO adaptable

Fairly narrow illuminator

Jun, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review by: Grzegorz Laskiewicz (amazon.com)

It's not a binocular, it's monocular

There is only one eyepiece to look through! Any 1st generation 4x50 scope surpasses this cmos based camera. I don't recommend it for any use. The only advantage is video output and external power supply input. Don't buy it.

May, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review by: Musaed H. M. Hassan (amazon.com)

not like the descripthion

After my experience of this telescope shows that normal and Lech Bahia Alejaddedodha vision Aleleh Lech Bamstoi required Blunt and ways to improve vision inaccurate compared with the price raised

Apr, 2007

Read the full review

Consumer review by: oldhud (shopping.com)

Infrared vision device

This monocular isn't really a light amplifying device like an image intensifier. It is essentially a B&W low-light CMOS camera, like you might find in a video security system, with an LCD display viewfinder and two infrared (IR) illuminators. Like most...

Clear B&W image, long distance IR spotlight, uses AA batteries

Viewfinder way too bright, spotlight doesn't fill view, not really low light device

Jan, 2007

Read the full review