JVC GR DX95EK

alaTest has collected and analyzed 17 reviews from magazines and websites. Reviewers really like the color and image quality. The portability and value for money also get good feedback, whereas the battery and viewfinder get less positive views.

usability, value for money, portability, image quality, color

viewfinder, battery

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Camcorders the JVC GR DX95EK is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 71/100 = Good quality.

See all JVC Camcorders

Review analysis

(Based on 17 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Showing 16 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews
Showing 1 - 10 of 16 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (2)

Expert review by:

JVC GR-DX95EK

 

JVC's GR-DX95EK offers handy combination of portability, performance and price, but one or two drawbacks need to be considered before purchasing.

Compact design, 3in. LCD, no right-handed bias to camera controls, F1.6 lens.

Battery is a little small, camera controls introduce camera shake, bottom-loading tape, monochrome internal viewfinder, no accessory shoe.

Consumer review by:

Amazon review summary for the JVC GR DX95EK

 

alaTest has collected and analysed 14 user reviews of the JVC GR DX95EK from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 4.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other Camcorders on Amazon.co.uk.

portability, usability, value for money, design, image quality

57% of reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

Consumer review by:

Forget the still images!!!!

 

Forget the still images!!!!

Yes, the still images are cronic, but thankfully I didn't buy it for that. I wanted a compact modern up to date digital compact dv camcorder with all the toys and guess what....thats what I got. The quality of the picture and sound playback are very...

ADVERTISEMENT

Consumer review by:

Still image is really bad

 

Still image is really bad

Hi, All other things being good (except video under low light is not as good as my old analogue Sony), but one thing is really bad. The digital still photo quality is really really bad, useless. I suspect the camcorder is faulty so emailed the photo to...

Consumer review by:

Still image is really bad

 

Still image is really bad

Hi,All other things being good (except video under low light is not as good as my old analogue Sony), but one thing is really bad. The digital still photo quality is really really bad, useless.I suspect the camcorder is faulty so emailed the photo to...

Consumer review by:

Still image is really bad

 

Hi,

Consumer review by:

A great camcorder, but....

 

A great camcorder, but....

I'd have to agree with "yevsy" in the sense that the quality of the stillimages is VERY poor. As this is the only camcorder I've owned this may bea usual criticism with all of them! My four year old Kodak DC280 gives aright kicking in terms of still...

Consumer review by:

A great camcorder, but....

 

I'd have to agree with "yevsy" in the sense that the quality of the stillimages is VERY poor. As this is the only camcorder I've owned this may bea usual criticism with all of them! My four year old Kodak DC280 gives aright kicking in terms of still...

Consumer review by:

A great camcorder, but....

 

A great camcorder, but....

I'd have to agree with "yevsy" in the sense that the quality of the stillimages is VERY poor. As this is the only camcorder I've owned this may bea usual criticism with all of them! My four year old Kodak DC280 gives aright kicking in terms of still...

Consumer review by:

nice camcorder for a cheap price

 

i recently purchased this camcorder,and i feel that its worth the money.although the still quality is not great, its not bad.

1
2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT