Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Contour Wearable Camcorder (1102)

alaTest has collected and analyzed 3 reviews of Contour Wearable Camcorder (1102). The average rating for this product is 4.1/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Camcorders for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the usability. The durability also gets good feedback. Opinions are divided on the design, while there are some negative reviews about the price.

portability, durability, usability

price

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Camcorders the Contour Wearable Camcorder (1102) is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 80/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 3 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
 
  (50% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews
  (50% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews
  (no reviews)
 
  (no reviews)
 

Showing 2 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (1)

Expert review by: Michael A. Prospero (laptopmag.com)

VHoldR Wearable Camcorder

 

Shooting hands-free video just got easier.

Unobtrusive, Sturdy and compact design, Pretty good VGA footage, Simple to use

Poor microphone placement, Occasional recording errors

The $349 VholdR falls into the midrange of helmet cams; it isn't as cheap (or as cheap-looking) as the $169 GoPro Helmet Hero, or as expensive as the military-grade-and government priced-VIO POV.1 $679. Its sturdy and compact all-in-one package is sure...

Apr, 2008

Expert review by: Brian Lam (gizmodo.com)

Lightning Review: VholdR Wearable Sport Camcorder

 

In honor of the upcoming Tahoe reader meetup on April 5th at Alpine Meadows, I'm going to be doing end of season reviews of some outdoor gadgetry that's been floating around the cabin.

In order to view comments on gizmodo.com you need to enable JavaScript

Jan, 2004