GE 27938 2.4 GHz 1-Line Cordless Phone

GE 27938 2.4 GHz 1-Line Cordless Phone
alaScore 66

16 reviews

Jun, 2013

We have collected and analyzed 16 user reviews from international sources. Users rate it 58/100. The average review date is Apr 18, 2005. We have compared these reviews to 92351 reviews from other Cordless Phones. The alaScore™ for this product is 66/100 = Good. Last update: Jun 17, 2013.

Review analysis

(Based on 16 reviews)

User Reviews  

Showing 1 - 10 of 16 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by:

buyer beware - avoid GE cordless phones

 

cheapdisplays LCD message

buttons stop working properly

Consumer review by:

Pwetty Good

 

Pwetty Good

Got one a year ago on closeout at MalWart for around $16. WIsh I'd gotten more of them. It has worked very well, better than a couple of similarly cheap V-Techs that I also got. Clear sound, usable buttons / user interface; LCD smallish but no worse...

Consumer review by:

GE Cordless Telephone Model 27938

 

Phone performance adequate other than the number dialing problem.

Phone has problems accepting button pushes when dialing phone numbers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Consumer review by:

A Pretty Decent Phone

 

A Pretty Decent Phone

I got this phone about a year ago and haven't had many problems with it. Yes, the other reviews are correct: The phone does not always display the caller ID. It will intermitently display "NO DATA". I have a feeling that it has to do with other phones...

Consumer review by:

Don't buy this.

 

Don't buy this.

I should have checked the reviews on this phone before purchasing, as I would have discovered that many people have experienced exactly what I'm going through now. The problem is that the caller ID works intermittently at best. If you're looking for...

Consumer review by:

Botton's died after less then a year.

 

Botton's died after less then a year.

I had this phone more then a year. I must admit it kept better then the other garbage that ATT, V Teck, Motorola and the others put out on the market these days. The signal was strong, clear sound, etc. However, after just over half a year the #7 and...

Consumer review by:

Botton's died after less then a year.

 

Botton's died after less then a year.

I had this phone more then a year. I must admit it kept better then the other garbage that ATT, V Teck, Motorola and the others put out on the market these days. The signal was strong, clear sound, etc. However, after just over half a year the #7 and...

Consumer review by:

Solid basic cordless telephone--but what's up with the battery?

 

Third update: Feb 20, 2006] I picked up a new battery pack at Sears for $11 a few weeks ago. Everything seems to be great again. People talk about "battery memory" (meaning that you don't give it an adequate workout & the charge won't hold as ...

Rather plain, but a decent value. . .I think

Iffy long-term battery performance ; lacks bells & whistles (no goofy game functions) ; non-illuminated keypad

Consumer review by:

dont get this phone

 

dont get this phone

I got this phone May 2004. It worked great, at first. About 3 months after I bought it, It would die in 20 minutes. Even if I had it on the charger all day. I do not recommend this phone. Also, I saw it at Best Buy for under $10.

Consumer review by:

Nice Phone

 

Nice Phone

I purchased three of these phones on sale and am quite satisfied with them. The sound quality is good, the features are easy to use, and the instructions were clear (there is a separate instruction sheet for English and Spanish). The range is...

1
2

Product Specifications

GE, 2.4 GHZ, White, Cordless Phone With Call Waiting Caller ID, 40 Name & Number Memory, Back Lit 3 Line LCD Display, Dial Back Function, Call Indicator, Voice Mail Indicator, Forward/Reverse Call Review With Delete Function, 0.5 Points.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT