Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Canon EOS M (with 22mm STM lens)

Canon EOS M (with 22mm STM lens)
alaAverage 3.6

3 reviews

Apr, 2014

alaTest has collected and analyzed 3 reviews from magazines and websites. Reviewers really like the portability. The image quality also gets good feedback, but many are less positive about the battery. Comments are divided on the responsiveness.

design, image quality, portability


On average, users rate this product 85/100.

See all Canon Digital Compact Cameras

Review analysis

(Based on 3 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (67% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews
  (33% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)


  Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)
  Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)
  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)
Image quality
  Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

Showing 3 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by:

Canon EOS M (with 22mm STM lens)


I liked the Canon EOS M more than I expected -- but less than I should have.

With a very nice touch screen, a well-designed body, and excellent photo quality, the Canon EOS M has some attractive qualities.

Seriously poor autofocus performance and battery life detract from the overall package.

While it provides one of the best touch-screen experiences in its class and the compact body is quite comfortable to shoot with, the Canon EOS M's disappointing performance and blah feature set make it less attractive than competitors.

Consumer review by:

"Great, particularly for existing Canon DSLR owners!"


Here are my two cents on the EOS M + 22mm f/2 STM kit lens. I'll point out that I'm a semi-pro, and I bought this camera as a more casual/portable alternative to my 5D Mark III and heavier L glass.

Image quality is great

Style is bland when compared to other mirrorless

Consumer review by:

"New firmware will speed up the autofocus significantly!"


The new firmware has been promised to arrive late in June early in July.

Canon should have made the superior very very important firmware update with the original release of the camera.