Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Casio QV-300

9 reviews

Apr, 2024

Positive
price (0)
memory (0)
usability (0)
screen (0)
size (0)

Negative

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 9 reviews of Casio QV-300. The average rating for this product is 3.0/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras for all reviews. People are impressed by the memory. The screen also gets good views. The price and usability get less positive views. There are some mixed opinions about the size.

screen, memory

usability, price

On average, users rate this product 60/100.

See all Casio Digital Cameras

Review analysis

(Based on 9 reviews)

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(11% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (33% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (11% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (33% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews (11% of reviews)
Show all 1 star reviews

Features

size
(Show all)

screen
(Show all)

usability
(Show all)

memory
(Show all)

price
(Show all)

Showing 9 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 9 of 9 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

i like the camera. resolution is a little low but it works quite well and has a sweet swivel lens.

swivel lens and big lcd screen

low resolution, no movie clips

Mar, 2003

Read the full review

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

There really is not much to this camera, very low resolution, no viewfinder, and the LCD screen is VERY difficult to follow. I'd recommend it only if you could get it for free, or close to it.

Swivel lens (like Nikon Coolpix 950)

No Viewfinder, Low Resolution, and very slow LCD screen. No external Memory.

Jun, 2000

Read the full review

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

I bought this Casio QV-30 camera and started using it June 16, 1996 and have thoroughly enjoyed it! I happened to see recently a negative report on a web site, it was undated, and I wondered about their intentions. This camera has served me quite well...

Being able to rotate the lens and take photos at waist level in ambient lighting in church. This allows unobtrusive picture taking, such as my grandson's baptism. Panaramas, such as the Grand Canyon turned out well. Closeups of flowers in our backyard...

No builtin flash on this early camera. But, it may not always be needed.

May, 2000

Read the full review

Consumer review (epinions.com)

QV-300 is not a good camera

I got this camera by bidding on Ubid a year ago. The price seemed to be reasonable(~$250). But when it arrived, I found it's not good one.

large LCD screen, 4M memory

difficult to use: big energy consumer, expensive

Dec, 1999

Read the full review

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

I have the QV-30B model, this camera is a good choice. Very good size and big lcd display. Pic quality is good.

Aug, 1999

Read the full review

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

Over the past month, I have tried a Casio QV-30+, QV-120, QV-200, QV-700, Minolta Dimage Pic, and Fuji DX-7. I will probably put up brief reviews of each one.The QV-30+ is an older camera, and this is reflected in it's maximum resolution of only...

Aug, 1998

Read the full review

Consumer review (photographyreview.com)

Casio QV 30

No big complaints, other than AC adapter is VERY NECESSARY and not included in the package. $20 at Radio Shack. Also the Adobe PhotoDeluxe (suppossedly included) was only a coupon that you have to send to Adobe and wait 3 weeks for the software. Image...

Apr, 1998

Read the full review

Consumer review (pcphotoreview.com)