Add reviews to your site
Find out how you can add reviews and ratings to your website or shop! Read more
Brother Fax-575 Reviews
Fax / copier - B/W - thermal transfer - 9.6 Kbps More product details
$58.43
alaTest Review Summary for Brother Fax-575
We have collected and analyzed 163 user reviews from international sources. Users rate it 80/100. The average review date is June 8, 2007. We have compared these reviews to 2835 reviews from other Fax Machines. The alaScore™ for this product is 82/100 = Very good. Last update: November 19, 2009.
820100
163 reviews
November, 2009
Product Age
old
new
163 Users
Trend
Rank 19
from $58.43
User Reviews (163)
Brother Fax-575
Bought this with a rebate (which made it free) for my home office to replace an older but larger...
Brother FAX-575 Plain Paper Fax
OVERALL I THINK THIS IS A PRETTY GOOD FAX MACHINE, FOR THE MONEY. OVERALL I THINK THIS IS A PRETTY GOOD FAX MACHINE, FOR THE MONEY. OVERALL I THINK THIS IS A PRETTY GOOD FAX MACHINE, FOR THE MONEY. OVERALL I THINK THIS IS A PRETTY GOOD FAX MACHINE, FOR TH...
StrengthsReasonable print quality. Reasonably priced replacement ribbon cartridges. Good price
Has some problems printing fine detail. If copying abnormally sized items, such as receipts, etc, 1 roller output can cause jams
Brother FAX-575 Plain Paper Fax
This is the perfect size and weight for home office. Fits perfectly on my bookcase. Sends fax quickly. Easy to set up even with my home phone and answering machine. highly reccommended product.
Perfect size and weight for home fax
none so far
Videos (5)
Manufacturer's Description
A convenient communications tool for a range of personal and home office applications, the new Fax 575 is a compact, stylish, plain-paper fax with an unobtrusive footprint that works well in typical home or home office environments. Special attention to compatibility with home telephone usage lets it switch seamlessly between fax and telephone modes, allowing customers to receive fax and voice calls on a single line.
Users who looked at this also looked at:
