Visit our Business Solutions website >>

MacBook Pro 2,4 GHz

alaTest has collected and analyzed 3 reviews of MacBook Pro 2,4 GHz. The average rating for this product is 4.2/5, compared to an average rating of 4.1/5 for other Laptops for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the keyboard and portability. The screen and design also get good comments. The battery and price get negative views. There are some mixed views about the usability.

design, screen, portability, keyboard

price, battery

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Laptops the MacBook Pro 2,4 GHz is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 78/100 = Good quality.

See all Apple Laptops

Review analysis

(Based on 3 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (100% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)

Showing 1 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (2)

Expert review by: Jackie Dove & Mark Hattersley (

MacBook Pro 2.4GHz review


Apple's new MacBook Pro may share the same aluminium colour as its predeceossor, but that's where all similarities end. Our review of the new MacBook Pro 2.4GHz explains why this radically different laptop is worth serious attention.

Thin, rounded design; easier to service and upgrade; ecologically conscious; gorgeous, bright, glossy screen; retains FireWire port; large trackpad with numerous multi-touch gesture choices; great new keyboard; powerful graphics processor

No choice of matte screen; trackpad button can be hard to press; disappointing battery life compared to the last model; some multi-touch gestures more difficult to maneuver than others

Upon the first look at the new MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, you could be forgiven for thinking little has changed. It still shares the same size and aluminium colour of its predecessor, but that's where all similarities end.

Oct, 2008