Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Philips GoGear Spark

Philips GoGear Spark
alaScore 82

6 reviews

Apr, 2015

alaTest has collected and analyzed 6 reviews of Philips GoGear Spark. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 3.9/5 for other MP3 Players for all reviews. Reviews about the battery and price are overall positive. The design and usability also get good reviews. There are mixed comments on the sound and portability, and many are critical about the storage.

usability, design, price, battery


We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other MP3 Players the Philips GoGear Spark is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 82/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 6 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

Showing 3 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (3)

Expert review by: Jesse Corbeil (

Philips GoGear Spark


Philips brings a little spark to the micro MP3 market. But was dropping the video capability a mistake?

Philips' coolest new product line is the GoGear Spark range of diminutive MP3 players, with or without optional FM tuners. Instead of following the pack into feature-creep territory, the GoGear Spark line keeps it simple. The result is a compact MP3...

Expert review by: Trusted Reviews (

Philips GoGear Spark SA2940


Is this the cheap, portable player to knock the Sansa Clip from its bargain-basement pedestal?

Feb, 2011

Expert review by: Donald Bell (

Philips GoGear Spark review


The Philips GoGear Spark is great for a budget MP3 player, offering an attractive balance of features, style and usability. It's also one of the first MP3 players in its price range to sport a colour display, and sound quality isn't bad either

Impressive colour screen ; Many features packed into a tiny package

Light on format support ; Voice recordings are noisy ; Meagre storage capacity

Battery life is much better than the iPod shuffle's as well, offering a lifespan of 27 hours, compared with the shuffle's 12 hours

Feb, 2009