Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6

alaTest has collected and analyzed 7 reviews of Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6. The average rating for this product is 3.0/5, compared to an average rating of 3.9/5 for other MP3 Players for all reviews. People really like the durability and performance. The usability and portability are also appreciated. Comments are divided on the storage. The size and battery get critical views.

price, portability, usability, performance, durability

sound, battery, size

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other MP3 Players the Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 83/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 7 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)
  (100% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)

Showing 7 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by: Michelle Mastin (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 Review: Good Price, Mediocre Quality


Available in two new sizes, the Samsung Galaxy Player is a Wi-Fi-connected Android media player that complements Samsung's popular Galaxy phone lineup--with the advantage that it doesn't require you to be tied to a phone contract or monthly data fees....

Inexpensive ; Expandable storage ; Full access to Google's apps

Thin audio quality ; Small, low-resolution screen isn't good for video

Samsung's Galaxy player 3.6 provides a lower-priced, Android-powered alternative to the iPod Touch, but its screen and audio quality come up short.

Jun, 2012

Expert review by: (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6


Editors' note: Some of this review is taken from CNET's review of the Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0 , which has a larger, 5-inch screen and many of the same features as the Galaxy Player 3.6.

The Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 offers most of the capabilities of Samsung's popular Android smartphones, minus the phone and monthly fees.

Screen quality is subpar and the camera is lackluster.

The Galaxy Player 3.6 costs $50 less than the Apple iPod Touch, but it's easy to see where Samsung cut corners.

Apr, 2012

Expert review by: Sascha Segan (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6


A budget smartphone without the phone, this low-cost media player should appeal to casual gamers and music listeners.

Inexpensive. Solidly built. Runs Android apps

Low-res screen

You're not actually saving much money by getting the Galaxy Player 3.6 instead of a smartphone. Looking only at prepaid no-contract Android phones, Virgin Mobile has the LG Optimus V (4 stars) for $129.99, MetroPCS has the HTC Wildfire S (3 stars) for...

Apr, 2012

Expert review by: Chris Burns (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 Review


As the world finds itself in a frenzy looking for every smart product they can get their hands on, Samsung continues to move forward with a series of relatively low-cost media machines called Galaxy Players. Today we're taking a peek at the Samsung...

This device is not an iPod touch competitor. Instead it's Samsung's effort to bring their user interface and media-controlling prowess to the non-mobile smart device world. You've got no mobile data, but the rest of the Android fun is all here - and at...

Apr, 2012

Expert review by: Ross Miller (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 review


It was just October of last year that Samsung released Galaxy Players 4.0 and 5.0 in the US, for $229 and $269, respectively. This week, the company released the Galaxy Player 3.6 — known outside...

Full Google Play store ; Bluetooth handset is a neat trick ; Decent bundled earbuds ; Codec support

Low resolution ; Poor viewing angles ; Price still not competitive

This is not the iPod alternative you're looking for

Apr, 2012

Expert review by: Michael Crider (

Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6 Review


Samsung isn't content with dominating the world of Android smartphones and tablets: they want the nebulous portable media player market as well. And more power to them, since they seem to be the only ones who do want it. Their Galaxy Player series is...

If you want something that’s going to replace your high-powered Android smartphone minus a data connection, look elsewhere. If you’re looking for a cheap alternative to the latest iPod Touch, you’re not going to get the same high-res screen or...

Apr, 2012

Consumer review by: The7arryIII (

"Cheap Android Device, Expensive Media Player"


Note: the Galaxy Player 4.2 is the best device in the Galaxy Player line. The Galaxy Player 5.0 (minitablet) comes next, but it's not as pretty as the 3.6 or the 4.2 and doesn't have a user-replaceable battery.

Cheap Android device (got one brand new for $140, including tax); costs less than an iPod nano

Not the best value as media player or as an Android device

Oct, 2012