Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Brother MFC-J4310DW

Brother MFC-J4310DW
alaScore 82

3 reviews

May, 2018

alaTest has collected and analyzed 3 reviews of Brother MFC-J4310DW. The average rating for this product is 2.7/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Printers for all reviews. Some have doubts about the usability and print quality, whereas comments are divided on the size.

paper handling, print quality, usability

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Printers the Brother MFC-J4310DW is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 82/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 3 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)
  (67% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews
  (33% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews
  (no reviews)


paper handling
  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)
print quality
  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)
  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)

Showing 3 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by : M. David Stone (

Brother MFC-J4310DW


The Brother MFC-J4310DW inkjet MFP can print at up to 11 by 17 inches.

Prints at up to tabloid size (11 by 17 inches). Ethernet. Wi-Fi. Wi-Fi Direct.

No automatic document feeder for scanning. Sub-par graphics quality. Tabloid-size paper requires manual feeding.

Jul, 2013

Expert review by : M. David Stone (

Brother MFC-J4310DW


The Brother MFC-J4310DW is basically a letter-size, office-oriented MFP that can also print on manually fed paper as large as 11 by 17 inches.

Setting up the printer and connecting it to a wired network is standard fare. For my tests, I installed the drivers on a Windows Vista system.

Aug, 2013

Consumer review (

Don't Make My Mistake



Slow b/w & color print speeds. Uses a lot of ink. Photo print quality is low. The automatic settings don't function correctly. You will have to manually set them by trial and error so that the photos are sharp. I cannot be more disappointed with this...

May, 2014