Visit our Business Solutions website >>

EPSON AMERICA C11CA19201 WorkForce 30 Inkjet Printer

alaTest has collected and analyzed 10 reviews of EPSON AMERICA C11CA19201 WorkForce 30 Inkjet Printer. The average rating for this product is 3.2/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Printers for all reviews. Reviewers really like the usability and print quality, but reviews are divided on the price. The reliability and durability get critical opinions.

performance, print quality, usability

noise, durability, reliability

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Printers the EPSON AMERICA C11CA19201 WorkForce 30 Inkjet Printer is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 75/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 10 reviews)

User Reviews  

Showing 10 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 10 of 10 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (

Worked right out of the box!


Bought it in order to print postage and as my four-in-one will not accept any envelope and eats labels. It's very fast, even in quiet mode. The draft mode will ease the ink usage, but every printer that I've owned has been a guzzler.If you're looking...

Jan, 2013

Consumer review (

worst one yet


I've bought a lot of products from this website,and this will be my LAST one. They all work great for a week....a month... and then they go bad. Poor printout quality - they get you thinking its a good product, then they go bad. No more for me.

Nov, 2011

Consumer review (

Ok printer


Nothing wrong with this printer once you get past the feeling of cheapness. The plastic is thin and it feels to be fragile but after you print a few things out you will be amazed at the quality of the printout for the price.

Jul, 2010

Consumer review (

WOW Now thats fast!


A bit clunky while printing. But great speed and print quality. Workforce 30 was less cost than to buy new ink for my old printer.

Jun, 2010

Consumer review (

Very Good Printer


Chose this printer because the Epson Stylus 60 finally kicked the bucket after many years of good service. I chose to slow down the printing from the default extra fast printing so as to keep this printer running as long as my previous Epson. It really...

Apr, 2010

Consumer review (

Excellent Printer for the Price


Excellent print quality both color graphics and text. Text alone is almost laser quality. FAST except when you choose higher quality printing modes. I haven't tried any photos yet.NO PAPER FEED PROBLEMS (I use well known brand multipurpose 20 lb...

Apr, 2010

Consumer review (

Very good


Excellent print quality, slightly noisy but not horrible. I suspect that the other poor reviews are due to ignorance and not the printer itself. I printed 250 full color documents right out of the box and was perfect.

Feb, 2010

Consumer review (

Epson 30 C11CA19201 WorkForce Color Inkjet Printer - 5760 x 1440 Optimized dpi, 38 ppm Black, 20 ppm Color, USB  EPSC11CA19201


Best way to put it, you get what you pay for... Paper does not go through well, and I really did not like the fact that it did not come with a USB cable, I don't recommend the WorkForce 30 Printer to anyone even for a cheap gift.

Feb, 2009

Consumer review (

Epson 30 C11CA19201 WorkForce Color Inkjet Printer - 5760 x 1440 Optimized dpi, 38 ppm Black, 20 ppm Color, USB  EPSC11CA19201


Pile of junk, won't feed paper properly, soundslike a bulldozer only louder. Bought a Epson 820sometime ago, same problems.I would think a companylike Epson could build a better product.

Jan, 2009

Consumer review (

Epson 30 C11CA19201 WorkForce Color Inkjet Printer - 5760 x 1440 Optimized dpi, 38 ppm Black, 20 ppm Color, USB  EPSC11CA19201


Fast, but almost worthless. This printer has been a waste of time. The paper never feeds correctly and constantly jams (every jam consumes ink). Prints black great but not color. Very expensive on ink and not efficient. We DO NOT recommend this printer.

Dec, 2008