Add reviews to your site
Find out how you can add reviews and ratings to your website or shop! Read more
NAD C375BEE Reviews
$1299.00
Decent build and spec ; plenty of inputs ; reasonable detail and decent bass (whathifi.com)
Für seine Klasse bot schon der Vorgänger NAD C 372 von Heft 4/04 Leistung satt. Kann der neue NAD... (stereoplay.de)
alaTest Review Summary for NAD C375BEE
We have collected and analyzed 4 expert reviews from international sources. Experts rate this product 87/100. The average review date is June 27, 2009. We have compared these reviews to 31904 reviews from other Receivers & Amplifiers. The alaScore™ for this product is 94/100 = Excellent. Last update: November 21, 2009.
940100
4 reviews
November, 2009
4 Experts
Product Age
old
new
Trend
Rank 25
from $1299.00
Expert Reviews (4)
NAD C375BEE
An average performance which doesn't do quite enough to justify the price
Decent build and spec ; plenty of inputs ; reasonable detail and decent bass
Struggles to engage ; lacks power, punch and dynamics ; hardens at loud volumes
Rating
NAD C375BEE
Note: This is an automatic translation. The text can differ from the original review.NAD stands behind test cheapest amplifier. A powerful man with muscles NOK to run about what it should be. The surprise is that it also sounds good !
When we set the NAD receiver to render the grand piano, we are immediately surprised that it not only has the dynamic driver and attacks we expected, but it also sounds quite refined. The amplifier is exuberant and rhythmic, markedly more than the more ex...
Rating
Manufacturer's Description
150 watts x 2 channels into 8 ohms (20-20,000 Hz) at 0.009% THD * 4-ohm capability allows use with a wide range of speakers * signal-to-noise ratio: 102 dB * PowerDrive circuit with automatic speaker impedance sensing delivers maximum dynamic power output regardless of speaker load * switchable Soft Clipping circuit gently limits amplifier power output to reduce risk of speaker damage due to prolonged high volume operation *
Users who looked at this also looked at:
