Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Plustek Smartphoto P60

Plustek Smartphoto P60
alaScore 80

27 reviews

Dec, 2016

alaTest has collected and analyzed 27 reviews of Plustek Smartphoto P60. The average rating for this product is 3.4/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Scanners for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Scanners the Plustek Smartphoto P60 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 80/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 27 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 14 of 14 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (13)

Consumer review by: (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for Plustek Smartphoto P60

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 6 user reviews of Plustek Smartphoto P60 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 2.8/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.1/5 for other Scanners on Amazon.co.uk.

67% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Plustek P60 Smart Photo ScannerPlustek P60 Smart Photo Scanner

Dec, 2016

Consumer review by: (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Plustek Smartphoto P60

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 1 user review of Plustek Smartphoto P60 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 1.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Scanners on Amazon.com.

0% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Smart Photo P60 Photo ScannerSmart Photo P60 Photo Scanner

Dec, 2016

Expert review by: (pcmag.com)

Plustek Smartphoto P60

 

If you're looking for a fast, easy way to turn 4-by-6 photos into digital images, and aren't too concerned about image quality, the Plustek SmartPhoto P60 ($90 street) is worth a look. This minimalist scanner handles up to 4- by 6-inch originals and...

Simple to use. Comes with protective sleeve for photos. Gets power over USB cable

No software beyond a scan utility and driver. Limited to 4-by-6 maximum scan size

The Plustek SmartPhoto P60 is designed strictly for photo scanning at up to 4 by 6 inches, and focuses on ease of use to the point of not including any application programs.

Expert review by: Anthony Dhanendran (talktalk.co.uk)

Plustek Smartphoto P60

 

Scan printed photos one by one Recently we have looked at two Plustek photo scanners, from opposite ends of the company’s range. The expensive Opticfilm 7600i produced superb results, while the ...

Jun, 2010

Consumer review by: fEsTiDiOuS (newegg.com)

Easy, Effective, Imperfect

 

I've only had experience with flatbed photo scanners. As harsh as the cons I've listed are I still like this thing, it's quick, easy and I can digitize photos from a laptop while on the go visiting family. I was really hoping to be able to scan long...

Small, Quick, Easy, Works, Cheap, USB powered (draws 400mA)

Unfortunately there are several cons. The calibration function doesn't work, all photos are slightly distorted. The results are stretched and make everyone look fat. The scanning element isn't very high quality. Scans of photos taken on a bright sunny...

Nov, 2014

Consumer review by: Josiah L. (newegg.com)

Easy, Effective, Imperfect

 

I've only had experience with flatbed photo scanners. As harsh as the cons I've listed are I still like this thing, it's quick, easy and I can digitize photos from a laptop while on the go visiting family. I was really hoping to be able to scan long...

Small, Quick, Easy, Works, Cheap, USB powered (draws 400mA).

Unfortunately there are several cons. The calibration function doesn't work, all photos are slightly distorted. The results are stretched and make everyone look fat. The scanning element isn't very high quality. Scans of photos taken on a bright sunny...

Nov, 2014

Consumer review by: Michael F. (newegg.com)

Don't trust the Plustek USB cable in the box

 

I also tried this scanner on a laptop XP 32 bit and it worked fine. I am amazed at how small this scanner is, it looks like something Ken & Barbie would use in their dollhouse so for your traveling setup this thing is perfect... it's lightweight and...

For Windows 7 64bit I used the updated driver from the manufacturer's website which installed very easy. Once I tossed the Plustek junk USB cable out and had a good workable USB cable installed in its place the setup was simple. Open the Plustek...

The Plustek cable is defective. I used an old spare I had in reserve and everything worked fine after changing out the cable. There was some dust on the scanner lens causing a streak through the first picture but after one cleaning the streak was gone....

Jun, 2012

Consumer review by: JMC (newegg.com)

It's 600dpi not 300dpi.

 

For an scanner of small photos it does a good job and is worth the sale price of $59.99, but not $89.99. I would have given it a 5 star rating except for the photo frame changes.

Very good image quality. It is actually a 600dpi not a 300dpi as advertised . Easy to connect and operate

For some reason after about 30 scans, the image would not copy. I had to restart my computer to start scanning again. Also the the image frame would slip for no apparent reason, and it often took several tries to get an image lined up properly. There...

Jan, 2011

Consumer review by: James C. (newegg.com)

It's 600dpi not 300dpi.

 

For an scanner of small photos it does a good job and is worth the sale price of $59.99, but not $89.99. I would have given it a 5 star rating except for the photo frame changes.

Very good image quality. It is actually a 600dpi not a 300dpi as advertised . Easy to connect and operate.

For some reason after about 30 scans, the image would not copy. I had to restart my computer to start scanning again. Also the the image frame would slip for no apparent reason, and it often took several tries to get an image lined up properly. There...

Jan, 2011