Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Panasonic CT-27E13 27 inch TV

alaTest has collected and analyzed 2 reviews of Panasonic CT-27E13 27 inch TV. The average rating for this product is 4.0/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other TVs for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the durability and design. The sound and price also get good feedback. There are some negative views about the image quality.

price, sound, design, durability

image quality

On average, users rate this product 80/100.

See all Panasonic TVs

Review analysis

(Based on 2 reviews)

User Reviews  

Review Ratings

  (no reviews)
  (100% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)
  (no reviews)


  Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)
image quality
  None yetShow negative (100%)(Show all)
  Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

Showing 2 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (

An Excellent TV, hides behind a Cheap Price Tag!


My wife and I were looking for a new TV around Christmas. We, like most, did not have tons of money, and were looking for a 27" TV that had half decent features, for a cheap price. Models like Apex, Orion, Durabrand, and Tatung. All name brands I have ...

Excellent Sound Quality, Cheap Price, Many different Audio/Video Options

Side speakers makes TV too wide to fit in a standard 27" entertainment unit.

Feb, 2005

Consumer review (

A Click Click Panablack with a Silver Arrow Quality Boom


a Click Click Panablack with a Boom Silver Arrow Quality I've owned around three Panasonic Panablacks, Panasonic CO Ltd introduce this models with goal of developing incredible quality and durability with comfortable price. By the time they came ...

Value TV, Simply to Operate, A Sound, get double of what you paying.

Picture could be better for the darkness at standard configuration, where is the PIP?

Jan, 2004