Sebo C 3 Airbelt

6 reviews

May, 2013

General overview
Price comparison
Product Specifications

We have collected and analyzed 2 expert reviews and 4 user reviews from international sources. Experts rate this product 89/100 and users rate it 100/100. The average review date is Jul 4, 2008. We have compared these reviews to 117976 reviews from other Vacuums. The alaScore™ for this product is 79/100 = Good. Last update: May 21, 2013.

Review analysis

(Based on 6 reviews)

Expert Reviews

User Reviews

Showing 1 - 6 of 6 Show Reviews: in English

Expert review by: AllergyBuyersClub.com (allergybuyersclub.com)

Sebo air belt C3.1 Canister Vacuum Cleaners

The first rate features on the Sebo air belt C3.1 are truly exciting to see on a canister vacuum in this price range. This is a power house of a vacuum that offers superior suction and user friendly controls and tools. Sebo has certainly done their...

Top of the line features at lower cost: SEBO is one of just a few brands to offer the electrified telescopic wand in a vacuum cleaner under $1000. There is no need to worry about electrical connections or plugs when changing from powerhead to another...

Slightly noisy on highest power setting: average noise level until high power setting ; Has paper vacuum dust bags: although well-made, the SEBO vacuum bags are made of paper; some other vacuum brands offer fabric-like bags which we prefer for optimal...

We were very impressed by the Sebo air belt C3.1 vacuum cleaners for a number of reasons: a powerhead with superior suction, large capacity bags, and top of the line features only found in high end vacuum cleaners, but at a more affordable price. This...

Read the full review

Expert review by: (goodhousekeeping.com)

Sebo Airbelt C3.1 9652PK Vacuum

Maxell’s Encore EN-5 offer a rich, full sound for an affordable price, beating out nearly all of the headphones in the test. However, our testers didn’t think they were very comfortable, nor did this pair do a good job staying put during use....

nbsp ; Excellent sound quality ; Adjustable ; Can withstand multiple drops ; Water-resistant ; Light weight and wraps up tightly for easy portability

nbsp ; Didn’t take much force to remove the headphones during our force test ; Consumer testers didn’t find them very comfortable to wear for long periods of time ; Didn’t always stay put during use for our consumer testers

Read the full review

Consumer review by: BOM (allergybuyersclub.com)

I love my vacuum cleaner

"When I first got my Sebo I thought, "Yeah, this better be good or its going back." Well, all I can say is "Yahoo!" Who knew a vacuum could be so good. It's quiet! The suction is unbelievably strong! The brush really kicks up the dirt and collects hair...

high quality, effective, quiet, reliable, easy to use, met my expectations, beat my expectations

Sep, 2010

Read the full review

Consumer review by: lotsofdogs2 (allergybuyersclub.com)

Unbelievable Quality and Performance!

"I've had this vacuum for 8yrs and use it everyday as well as loan it weekly to two sisters. It's been an awesome machine. I raise large dogs and have a child w/allergies. It's the best vacuum ever for dirt, dust and pet hair. It's been used and abused...

high quality, effective, reliable, easy to use, met my expectations, very durable

Dec, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review by: Karen (allergybuyersclub.com)

Excellent and worth it.

"We needed a high quality vacuum due to my huband's allergies and a new puppy. We selected this one over the Miele due to the swivel handle, comfortable handle, swivel at base, and the power brush was nicer. My girls (10 and 9) were both able to...

high quality, effective, quiet, reliable, easy to use, met my expectations

Mar, 2009

Read the full review

Consumer review by: (dooyoo.co.uk)

Sebo C3 Power : Arnie's Here.........

I hate vacuum cleaning. From my perspective, vacuum cleaners are designed and sold by people who clearly have never had to vacuum in their lives. Every time I review and test a vacuum cleaner, I shake my head at the features the engineers could have...

Mar, 2004