Visit our Business Solutions website >>

VAX 3-IN-1 Multivax 6131T

alaTest has collected and analyzed 1063 reviews of VAX 3-IN-1 Multivax 6131T. The average rating for this product is 4.4/5, compared to an average rating of 4.2/5 for other Vacuums for all reviews. Reviewers really like the design. The price also gets good feedback, whereas there are some mixed opinions about the size. There are some critical comments about the reliability.

usability, price, design


We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Vacuums the VAX 3-IN-1 Multivax 6131T is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 85/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 1063 reviews)

User Reviews  

Showing 1062 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 1062 of 1062 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review ( review summary for VAX 3-IN-1 Multivax 6131T


alaTest has collected and analyzed 1053 user reviews of VAX 3-IN-1 Multivax 6131T from The average user rating for this product is 4.4/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.2/5 for other Vacuums on People are impressed by the design. The price is also appreciated. Many are negative about the reliability, and there are some mixed opinions about the size.

usability, price, design


92% of the reviews on give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Vax 6131T 3-in-1 Multivax Dry Vacuum and Carpet WasherVax 6131T 3-in-1 Multivax Dry Vacuum and Carpet Washer

Apr, 2018

Consumer review (

Perfectly satisfied


This product cleans well, even small crumbs. Although the water suction tube is fiddly to attach, it works well. This is my second model after twenty years.

Oct, 2015

Consumer review (

Best on the Market


First one purchased about 12 years ago. The new cleaner seems more powerfull and the paper dust bags are a definate improvement on the old cloth bags.Never used as a wet cleaner but for garage and car cleaning I rate as first class

Aug, 2015

Consumer review (

not bad


Mostly does what it says and good suction but extremely annoying that there is nowhere to wind the long cable which puts it at a disadvantage compared to self winding Henrys.Also clips holding the top to the base are a bit hit and miss.

Jun, 2015

Consumer review (

Carpet washer and hoover


I love this robust , tangoed multi hoover :-) it does exactly what it say on the box

Feb, 2015

Consumer review (

Super Vax!


Brilliant machine at a brilliant price. bought to replace a earlier, 25 year old vax model that never let us down. a shame they changed from a cloth reusable bag to a paper disposable bag but I suppose it makes for less mess to just throw it away and...

Feb, 2015

Consumer review (

very effective and great value


I bought this to primarily help sort out my house after some fairly extensive renovations, with dust and dirt having found its way everywhere. Once mastered, the Vax is not only a very good vacuum cleaner, but also a remarkably effective rug, carpet,...

Oct, 2014

Consumer review (

Brilliantly clean carpets


Brilliant vacuum power, awesome cleaning, light weight and long enough cable to vacuum the whole house for one socket. Carpets and furniture now looking like new apart from a few persistant marks like coffee spills that will require specialist cleaner,...

Oct, 2013

Consumer review (

Powerful handful


John Lewis delivery was to its usual standard - rapid; top marks. We have not yet used the Vax more than a couple of times but it works very well indeed. The machine appears to be well-made and should last for years to come.Suction is very powerful, a...

Aug, 2012

Consumer review (

Reliable appliance


This is my second Multivax. The first one lasted 10 years. I like the way you can use the same head for hard floors and carpets. Makes it much easier. Has performed very well but have only used it as vacuum so far. The tubing seems to be longer as well...

Apr, 2012