Visit our Business Solutions website >>

VAX UB9-P1-B

VAX UB9-P1-B
alaAverage 3.8

4 reviews

Mar, 2015

alaTest has collected and analyzed 4 reviews of VAX UB9-P1-B. The average rating for this product is 3.8/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Vacuums for all reviews. Reviewers are impressed by the price, but there are some less positive opinions about the design.

price

design

On average, users rate this product 75/100.

Review analysis

(Based on 4 reviews)

User Reviews  

Showing 4 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by: Tennis12 (comet.co.uk)

Best vacuum so far.

 

Bought this a month ago and it has so far proved to be one of the best we have ever owned. Can be a bit noisy but it is excellant on suction. No hand tools with it but I can use old ones from my previous cleaner. Would certainly recommend it to a...

lightweight

no hand toolds

Jun, 2012

Consumer review by: dannielley2k1 (comet.co.uk)

Best Hoover I've Ever had

 

I got this hoover a couple of months ago and it is the best one I've ever owned. I've previously owned a Vax in the past and this one is 100% better. It is quite light to carry and has a very long cord, making it much easier to do the...

good suction, long cord

slightly louder than average

Feb, 2012

Consumer review by: jo69 (comet.co.uk)

Does the job

 

I have had this cleaner for a couple of months now and find it extremely good. It does sound like a jet engine starting up but it is fantastic at picking up even the smallest bits of fluff and dirt off the carpets. It has a strong suction and is smooth...

Feb, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT

Consumer review by: Enraged (comet.co.uk)

VAX upright-would not recomend

 

Based on the VAX name we bought this machine. I would NOT recomend it. It is EXTREMELY NOISY, blows air all over the place (circulating dust or moving it around the house). The filter is a nightmare to clean, the hose is very difficult to remove, no...

long cable

see the long list above and not value for money

Feb, 2012
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT