Visit our Business Solutions website >>

LG Front Load Washer WM2301H

LG Front Load Washer WM2301H
alaAverage 5

7 reviews

Oct, 2015

alaTest has collected and analyzed 7 reviews of LG Front Load Washer WM2301H. The average rating for this product is 5.0/5, compared to an average rating of 4.2/5 for other Washing Machines for all reviews.

On average, users rate this product 100/100.

Review analysis

(Based on 7 reviews)

User Reviews  

Showing 1 - 7 of 7 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review by: skeeter (



I am amazed every time I remove items from the washer--they are almost dry. This reduced the drying time for most things. Also, the washer is quiet. My house is very small, and I really have to listen to hear it. I LOVE IT!

Oct, 2010

Consumer review by: Anonymous (

Great washer


My family warned me not to by a front loader because they are trouble... but not mine!

Jul, 2010

Consumer review by: Nana (

Good Purchase


Easy to use & quiet, Wrings the water out of the clothes very good, Cleans clothes better than old washer did. I like the "Speed Wash Cycle"

Jul, 2010

Consumer review by: SoffiGirl (



I've had my set over a year and use it daily. No problems, easy to use and cleans very well.

Jul, 2010

Consumer review by: Pickle (

Load Choices


We purchased both LG Washer & Dryer and love them both! The washer cleans very well and spins clothes almost dry. Dryer dries twice as fast as my old set. The only thing I would correct is the sound on the end of cylce. It is too soft. My appliances...

Feb, 2010

Consumer review by: Montanapug (

Excellent machine


We bought this washer to replace a GE Audora, that was only 3 years old, and had been a problem from day one. This LG is wonderful, so quiet, and the numerous cycle selections work very well for us.

Aug, 2009

Consumer review by: Happy Launderer (

LG Front Loader - So far, so good!


I have had this machine for just over a month now, and have no complaints so far. I love the various cycle settings and features, and the large capacity. It seems very efficient (using less water), and requires shorter drying times, due to the high...

Dec, 2007