Add reviews to your site
Find out how you can add reviews and ratings to your website or shop! Read more
Whirlpool WFW8300SW Reviews
$539.00
alaTest Review Summary for Whirlpool WFW8300SW
We have collected and analyzed 160 user reviews from international sources. Users rate it 74/100. The average review date is October 8, 2006. We have compared these reviews to 13363 reviews from other Washing Machines. The alaScore™ for this product is 55/100 = Good. Last update: November 21, 2009.
550100
160 reviews
November, 2009
Product Age
old
new
160 Users
Trend
Rank 100
from $539.00
User Reviews (160)
Whirlpool WFW8300SW
First off, the basics- this machine's cubic capacity is 3.3 cubic feet. Mine, with the pedestal stands 50 inches tall, 27 inches wide, and is 26 inches deep. Be sure to measure not only the spot where you are going to place the set, but the doorways you h...
Adaptive Variable Speed Motor
none
whirlpool duet
Mine has been pretty good. I would not agree that I can do sixteen pairs of jeans or towels in it. I do like having the extra rinse function & heavy duty cycle, I use them quite a lot. And I did want an energy star model. Like many buyers ...
extra rinse choice
common F20 error requiring a $35 valve should have been recalled.
Whirlpool WFW8300SW
Whirlpool WFW8300SW. Hi to all and Good day to all my co-ciao members, reviewers and viewers of the product of washing machine under cia0. As i know this is a front loading type washing machine that makes very easy to be use and as other also having 3.4 c...
good
nonoe
Manufacturer's Description
ENERGY STAR Qualified 7 cycles, including whitest whites, heavy duty, normal/casual, quick wash, delicate, drain/spin, rinse/spin 6 hour delay wash On/off end-of-cycle signal Infinite water levels Out-of-balance detection Automatic temperature control Ultra Efficient Design - uses 60% less water and 67% less energy in every load, compared to average traditional top load washers Ultra Capacity Care Control Temperature Management - keeps water warm enough to dissolve detergents for optimal...
Users who looked at this also looked at:
