alaTest USA - Product Tests & Reviews

Plustek OPTICFILM 7300 User Reviews

Film scanner (35 mm) - 35mm film - 7200 dpi x 7200 dpi - Hi-Speed USB More product details

Plustek OPTICFILM 7300
alaSCORE 88

67 reviews

November, 2009

72 / 100

6 Experts

Product Age

old
new

79 / 100

61 Users

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (6)
US

alaTest collected and analyzed 4 user reviews of the Plustek OPTICFILM 7300 from newegg.com. The average user rating from newegg.com is 75 out of 100.

Quotes

Great scanner

Install went smoothly on Vista. Scanner works great and does everything it should. Prints look great You need SilverFast HDR to make use of the 48 bit...

Plustek OpticFilm 7300 A17-BBM31-C 48bit CCD Single Pass 7200 x 7200 dpi Hardware Resolution Scanner - Retail

Very poor business for a manufacturer to sell a product under false pretenses. economical Will not work as designed and advertised with Photoshop Ele...

Great for the home scrapbooker

If you want a more professonal and higher resolution scan, I would get a different scanner, but for scrap booking family slides and negative, this is ...

Great for the home scrapbooker

If you want a more professonal and higher resolution scan, I would get a different scanner, but for scrap booking family slides and negative, this is ...

US

alaTest collected and analyzed 19 user reviews of the Plustek OPTICFILM 7300 from amazon.com. The average user rating from amazon.com is 81 out of 100.

Quotes

Terrible!

Terrible! I am extremely disappointed with this thing. Scan quality is poor. The program either shuts down or closes Photoshop after every few scans...

impressive resolution for low price

impressive resolution for low price I've had other film scanners and most of them required a SCSI card, and a lengthy calibration process every few ho...

Just what I needed.

Just what I needed. I am currently scanning my slide collection to my computer. Doing the slides scanning one at a time is time consuming, but I knew ...

Very good Slide Scanner

Very good Slide Scanner I purchased the Plustek Opticfilm 7300 to convert my 500+ Slide film library to digital and it did just not disappoint me. The...

GB

alaTest collected and analyzed 28 user reviews of the Plustek OPTICFILM 7300 from reevoo.com. The average user rating from reevoo.com is 80 out of 100.

Quotes

Plustek OpticFilm 7300

Good quality of scans. There is an excellent option to be able to do batch scans so that the file numbers are created automatically by adding to text ...

Plustek OpticFilm 7300

Fast, easy to work with. Poor instructions.

Plustek OpticFilm 7300

Neat and tidy and easy to set up and use bundled software and drivers both required updating before the thing would work correctly.

65 and going strong!

Compact design, easy of setting up. Quality of final image. Software requires a lot of 'expert' knowledge. There is no hard copy instructions. It woul...

Average Rating

80

GB

alaTest collected and analyzed 4 user reviews of the Plustek OPTICFILM 7300 from amazon.co.uk. The average user rating from amazon.co.uk is 75 out of 100.

Quotes

Labour intensive, but worth the effort.

Labour intensive, but worth the effort. To get the best out of this scanner, you need to be prepared to lavish a little loving care on each slide. It ...

Excellent for the price

Excellent for the price Using with a Mac PC running OSX 10.5.2 I found this to be excellent and far in front of others at the price. I have now scanne...

Too much hassle

Too much hassle I had real problems getting this to work reliably, many times the device wouldn't be detected and wouldn't scan anything. The software...

Works well - but not perfect

Works well - but not perfect I'm working my way through scanning a lifetime of slides - over 2500. The 7300 does a workman like job using 'Quickscan'...

Average Rating

75

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 in English

See user reviews in other languages (6)

Compare Prices

loading...

loading...

Search results - you may continue typing to narrow your search.

loading

loading

loading

loading...