166 reviews
December, 2008
alaTest collected and analysed 1 user reviews of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/1.0-2.8L USM from photographyreview.com. The average user rating from photographyreview.com is 100 out of 100.
alaTest collected and analysed 1 user reviews of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/1.0-2.8L USM from ciao.co.uk. The average user rating from ciao.co.uk is 100 out of 100.
Quotes
Buy it
I've bought 3 of these now, One for me and one for my mum and one for my boyfriends mum when they got their first digital cameras! I was a bit sceptic...
alaTest collected and analysed 156 user reviews of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/1.0-2.8L USM from amazon.com. The average user rating from amazon.com is 90 out of 100.
Quotes
strong and handy, but the string is a bit short though
strong and handy, but the string is a bit short though strong and handy, but the string is a bit short if you are using zoom-tele lenses which tend to...
you will not be shipped a Sima product
you will not be shipped a Sima product I ordered this and received 3 separately packaged Bower cap keepers, rather than a Sima three-pack. Shop elsew...
Would be good, except...
Would be good, except... This was an excellent product until the shoddy string that connects to the elastic band broke. I've tried reconnecting them, ...
Fun Lens to Have
Fun Lens to Have Have owned this lens since December 2007 and have had a lot of fun with it. At 17mm, it functions like a conventional wide angle lens...
alaTest collected and analysed 2 user reviews of the Canon EF 16-35mm f/1.0-2.8L USM from amazon.co.uk. The average user rating from amazon.co.uk is 60 out of 100.
Quotes
Should come with a warning... this is a fisheye
Should come with a warning... this is a fisheye I have had this lens for 5 months now and I think it has been my main lens for that time, but IT IS A ...
Cheap, not so cheerful.
Cheap, not so cheerful. Perhaps I expected too much from this little lens. It's build quality is good, it is compact and quite light.
It has tw...
Showing 1 - 4 of 4 in English
Users who looked at this also looked at:
loading...
loading...
loading...