Scosche RH1056M

38 reviews

Apr, 2024

Positive
sound (40)
comfort (36)
price (25)
durability (11)
bass quality (11)

Negative
size (8)
portability (6)

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 38 reviews of Scosche RH1056M. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Headphones for all reviews. People really like the usability and bass quality. The price and comfort also get good views. Views are divided on the portability. Many are negative about the size.

sound, comfort, price, bass quality, usability

size

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Headphones the Scosche RH1056M is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 78/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 38 reviews)

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(37% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (29% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (24% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (11% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews (no reviews)

Features

sound
Show positive (80%)Show negative (20%)(Show all)

comfort
Show positive (80%)Show negative (20%)(Show all)

price
Show positive (96%)Show negative (4%)(Show all)

bass quality
Show positive (65%)Show negative (35%)(Show all)

size
Show positive (38%)Show negative (62%)(Show all)

More features

Showing 38 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 27 of 38 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Scosche RH1056M

alaTest has collected and analyzed 17 user reviews of Scosche RH1056M from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.2/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Headphones on Amazon.com. Opinions about the mids quality and treble quality are overall positive. The price and comfort are also mentioned favorably, whereas there are some mixed opinions about the portability. Some have doubts about the size.

sound, comfort, price, treble quality, mids quality

size

94% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Apr, 2024

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Great headphones, but remote buttons came loose

I travel with these headphones frequently on both airplanes and in car. Audio quality is great, and answering calls from my iphone is super convenient. Just disappointed that I can't find a replacement for the tapline wire. The rubber/silicon buttons...

Sound quality, tapline remote was good until buttons came out

Tapline buttons started to pop out--can't find a replacement wire

May, 2016

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Nifty Headphones

I liked these while I had them, now I just have the tapline controller and the hard case. The headphones came with another simple cable I was using (my MP3 player does not support the playback / volume controls). Nice things tend to be the target of...

Nice headphones. Detachable cord. Tapline control (if your device supports it). Hard case (big, but sturdy) Headphones fold to fit into this case, yet the hinges are metal and sturdy (in contrast to plasic hinges, which have broke on me twice). These...

Nice things tend to attract sticky fingers...

Dec, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Great Headphones

If I chose not to buy them during the sale, I would have regretted it. Honestly, one of the better headphones for under $100 (depends on the sales) :D

Price 5, Comfort 4, Quality 4 ; So let's start with the price, Bang for Buck easily the best headphones I've had thus far. I've got a pair of SkullCandy Crushers and those are roughly the same quality, for roughly the same price. I got these for $56...

A little tight around the head, gets a little uncomfortable when worn longer than 4 hours. Otherwise none

Sep, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Actually for the price they weren't that bad

Comfy, sound pretty decent after SEVERAL hours of burning in

highs are too high. mid is good, lows are okish

Sep, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

I take it back

I take back my other review, i let them burn in for another hour, and they are starting to sound a little better, but still for the price might want to consider looking at other options.

Comfortable

Slightly too high highs, not as mellow as they need to be, and not as crisp

Sep, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Pretty bad

these should be worth around 40-50$, maybe i haven't let them burn in long enough, but initial thoughts on these are that they are comfy, but sound like garbage. with comparison to the ATH-50's, and V-moda crossfade lps that i own, i thought i'd snag...

very comfortable, can hardly notice they are on my head

terrible sound quality. the lows are ATROCIOUS, mids are meh, highs are too high

Sep, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Incredible

Another reason to buy these headphones is the accessories that come with them, you get 2 awesome carrying cases a soft one and a hard one, you get two cables one with Tapline III which is an excellent feature and an extra long one, you get a 3.5 mm...

SOUND QUALITY: Incredible sound, best audio I've ever heard. Only difference between this and a live convert is that these probably sound better :) I've seen many reviews saying these headphones are equal to or better than studio beats, I don't own a...

Aug, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Quality control?

I had to RMA my first pair. Issues with the first pair. Day one caught a chill, shook my head and found out the left speaker was just rattling around inside. Managed to fix this but not properly or completely since it was in a permanently sealed...

Sound is great for the price ; Comparable if not better than Skull Candy Aviators, the only thing I have access to for comparison besides my old Turtle Beach Z1's, which are blown away in sound quality ; I didn't like anything below 320kbps but now...

Small earcups ; The inside of the foam measures 2.25 in x 1.25 in. According to an internet search the average human ear size is 2.5in for men and 2.3in for women. Not sure what the designer was thinking ; Designed for Apple ; Quality control (see...

Jul, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Quality control?

Sound is great for the price Comparable if not better than Skull Candy Aviators, the only thing I have access to for comparison besides my old Turtle Beach Z1's, which are blown away in sound quality. I didn't like anything below 320kbps but now cant...

Small earcups The inside of the foam measures 2.25 in x 1.25 in. According to an internet search the average human ear size is 2.5in for men and 2.3in for women. Not sure what the designer was thinking. Designed for Apple Quality control (see "Other...

Jul, 2014

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Very Disappointed

"You can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig!" Really wanted to like these. Was hoping the few reviews I read about how these are more on-your-ear vs. over-your ear; and that regardless on one's personal ear/head dimensions, they clamp down on...

Packaging, accessories... sounded pretty good too

Uncomfortable at best for short periods, PAINFUL to my ears... and scalp within an hour

Jun, 2014

Read the full review