Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Samsung ML-1640

alaTest has collected and analyzed 454 reviews of Samsung ML-1640. The average rating for this product is 4.1/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews. Reviewers really like the size and design. The usability and price also get good feedback. Many are less positive about the paper handling and reliability.

performance, price, usability, design, size

noise, reliability, paper handling

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other products in the same category the Samsung ML-1640 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 83/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 454 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Showing 82 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews


Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 33 of 82 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (133)

Consumer review ( review summary for Samsung ML-1640


alaTest has collected and analyzed 23 user reviews of Samsung ML-1640 from The average user rating for this product is 3.6/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other products in the same category on Opinions about the design and performance are on the whole positive. The noise and usability are also mentioned favorably. Many are less positive about the reliability.

price, usability, noise, performance, design


74% of the reviews on give this product a positive rating.

Sep, 2020

Expert review by : InsideHW (

Expert Review


In accordance with ASUS philosophy of presenting new devices in short periods of time, not long after the first Fonepad, new models, Fonepad Note 6 and Fonepad 7, have been announced. Unfortunately, f... Mechanical keyboard are conceptual way of going...

Aug, 2010

Expert review by : Trusted Reviews (

Samsung ML-1640 Mono Laser


Samsung keeps things simple with its latest personal mono laser, the ML-1640.

Feb, 2011

Expert review by : Simon Williams (

Samsung ML-1640


Need a mono laser printer at very low cost? Look no further.

While a cover for the paper tray would be a bonus, this is, nonetheless, a well designed, entry-level mono laser printer which, although simple, does everything you could ask for under £50. It's quick, does well on printing text and reasonably well on...

Jun, 2009

Expert review by : Jayesh Limaye (

Samsung ML-1640 [Review]


Small and inexpensive mono laser printer

Fast, inexpensive, silent operation, build quality

Cost per print is a bit high

Mar, 2009

Expert review by : TechTastic (

Samsung ML-1640 Mono Laser Printer


Lasers printers have traditionally been out of the price reach for a lot of computer users. Gone are those days, thanks inpart to Samsungs new line of low cost laser printers. Today we take a look at one of these printers called the ML-1640 Mono Laser...

Dec, 2008

Consumer review (

SAMSUN ML-1640 printer


Hello, this is my third review. My all reviews is from my own experience and this item I use more then 1 month. This printer is for working people. It's not very expensive and working very good. Printing very fast and high quality. This printer prints...

Printing very fast and high quality

Printer is not very small

Jun, 2009

Consumer review (

Love this printer


" Great value for amount paid works very reliably page after page - Love! "

Inexpensive , Durable , Lightweight

Jun, 2014

Consumer review (




Poor quality

Mar, 2012

Consumer review (

Great worker!


" Great little printer for regular, b & w jobs -- letters, spreadsheets, etc. Easy to use and maintain. I've had mine for three years and never a problem. "

Inexpensive , Durable , Realistic color , Lightweight

Mar, 2011

Consumer review (

Samsung ML-1640


Coming from an ink jet printer we found this to be a fast high quality printer. We used it to print our wedding stationary and were more than happy with the results. Comparing it in general terms to our old ink jet, as an occasional user I like that we...

None so far and we've had it 5 months.

Aug, 2010