Kodak P811bk 8x10 Personal Photo And Negative Scanner

alaTest has collected and analyzed 12 user reviews of the Kodak P811bk 8x10 Personal Photo And Negative Scanner from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other products on Amazon.com.

Set up and ready to use in 5 minutes. Pros: Very easy to use. Cons: quality less than expected from Kodak. However, I've used different negative scanners and the results are not that bad compared to other brands. Considering the price and speed - this...

not good scannin. negatives dont come up as they should. not worth considering. would like to return it. you get what you pay for, save your bucks.

Tackling hoards of family photographs, this little wand of a printer has proved to be a workhorse. I've literally plowed through hundreds of pictures, cut-outs from newspapers and hand-written keepsakes. As I've done this, concerns exacerbated by my...

I just got it and I scanned 60 pictures in less than an hour. I am super impressed with it on first glance. No problems yet and super easy to use. I love that it is completely portable if I want to take it somewhere else and scan old pics.

This little scanner is the BEST investment I have ever made. I have had it a couple of weeks and just love it. I have scanned hundreds of photo's. Some people have complained about white lines in their photo's but I really haven't had that problem a...

I bought this scanner in March 2012. For the first few weeks it was fine. Quality was as good as I needed. Not at all hard to set up and use, although it was not as speedy as I hoped. I thought perhaps I could scan photos while watching TV or...

Gog produkt. It is easy to use and the picture is in superb quality.the reason that i dont give it all stars Is that it is a litle slow.

I recently found old photo albums that I wanted to save as jpg files so that I could share them, reprint them, etc. I purchased the Kodak scanner and wish I could submit a request for a refund. It was a complete waste of money. Each photo has to be...

A few years ago I set out to scan some 8,000-10,000 family photos, using a Dell all-in-one scanner. I could only scan at 300dpi, because any higher than that would have taken way too long. Even so, it took me about 3 months of scanning for hours at a...