alaTest
>
Electronics
>
TVs
>
SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M

SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M

120 reviews

May, 2024

Positive
price (27)
usability (15)
design (8)
reliability (6)
image quality (5)

Negative
durability (7)

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 120 reviews of SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M. The average rating for this product is 3.6/5, compared to an average rating of 4.3/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews. Reviews about the size and image quality are on the whole positive. The design and usability also get good opinions, whereas views are divided on the reliability. Some have doubts about the durability.

price, usability, design, image quality, size

durability

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other products in the same category the SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 82/100 = Very good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 120 reviews)

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(38% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (22% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (12% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (14% of reviews)
Show all 2 star reviews (15% of reviews)
Show all 1 star reviews

Features

price
Show positive (79%)Show negative (21%)(Show all)

usability
Show positive (71%)Show negative (29%)(Show all)

durability
Show positive (36%)Show negative (64%)(Show all)

reliability
Show positive (55%)Show negative (45%)(Show all)

design
Show positive (89%)Show negative (11%)(Show all)

More features

Showing 120 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 120 of 120 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M

alaTest has collected and analyzed 114 user reviews of SuperSonic YYMG-98373956M from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.1/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com. Views about the image quality and design are generally positive. The reliability and usability also get good feedback, but there are some less positive opinions about the durability.

price, usability, reliability, design, image quality

durability

70% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

May, 2024

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Terrible reception

One of the very few times I will be returning a product. A product has to be truly worthless for me to go through the trouble of sending it back.

It was cheap

Does not work. The signal was very weak - picture was impossible to make out for most channels it caught

Feb, 2015

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Works under best case conditions

I live on a third-floor apartment and 30 miles away from signal towers. Your antenna's performance may differ if you live underground, surrounded by a metal box. The FCC has a site where you can type in your ZIP code and see what towers are in range of...

Cheap ; Gets all local channels and then some ; Quality for the main channels are either very good, or just a little fuzzy ; Easy assembly ; Able to reposition a bit; not extensively

The antenna doesn't snap totally securely to its platform. It's sufficient if you leave it alone, but can easily slide back out while adjusting ; As the others are saying, the co-ax cable is attached, and is only 3 feet. Factor it in, and get a...

Sep, 2013

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

UHF

A FCC reference antenna looks a lot like: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=82-145-017 but does not have the rabbit ears nor amplifier.

Performance is about the same as the FCC reference antenna in the 470-860MHz band (UHF Channels 14-69). There are no VHF channels in my area. The specs for this antenna suggest it is designed for UHF ; The base design allows multiple arrangements

Cable is attached instead of using a standard male connector. Construction of the base is flimsy and weak

Mar, 2013

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Receives DTV signals during bad storms

Note: Most TV stations transmit with vertical polarization, meaning for best reception, you should set it up so it's elements are vertical. Spring 2011, I was stuck at home during a really bad storm. The storm came out of nowhere, going from a mostly...

Very sensitive antenna ; Long range ; High quality ; Easily adjustable

The coax cable could be longer

Jun, 2012

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

Best Indoor Antenna I've Seen So Far

I gave KableTown the heave-ho two years ago in favor of free over-the-air TV. I had tried 3 different antennas (both amplified and non-amplified), and none of these could get all the channels clearly all of the time. I live only 8 miles from the...

Once aligned and positioned correctly, this antenna was able to tune all local broadcasts. I just put it together (which took about 30 seconds), plugged it in, pointed it at the broadcast towers, and BLAM-O, got all the local channels -- even those...

The antenna's coax cord is very short (about 3'). You may need another cable and a male-to-male adaptor to position it ; I actually still get some occasional blocking/freezing on one VHF station with the antenna sitting on a stereo speaker 3' off the...

Sep, 2011

Read the full review

Consumer review (tigerdirect.com)

It's just OK

Been looking for a good over the air HD antana for a long time and thought I would try it because I read some reviews stating it had great reception. It's really no better than my home made HD TV antana. We went back to my home made one because I...

Jul, 2011

Read the full review