Visit our Business Solutions website >>

Motorola DECT 6.0 Cordless Phone with 2 Handsets, Digital Answering System and Mobile Bluetooth Linking L702BT

We have collected and analyzed 1 expert reviews and 22 user reviews from international sources. Experts rate this product 40/100 and users rate it 71/100. The average review date is Nov 3, 2013. We have compared these reviews to 248979 reviews from other Cordless Phones. The alaScore™ for this product is 77/100 = Good. Last update: Dec 10, 2018.

Review analysis

(Based on 23 reviews)

Expert Reviews  

User Reviews  

Showing 23 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.
Showing 1 - 23 of 23 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Motorola DECT 6.0 Cordless Phone with 2 Handsets, Digital Answering System and Mobile Bluetooth Linking L702BT

 

alaTest has collected and analyzed 22 user reviews of Motorola DECT 6.0 Cordless Phone with 2 Handsets, Digital Answering System and Mobile Bluetooth Linking L702BT from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 3.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Cordless Phones on Amazon.com. Views about the performance and price are on the whole positive. The durability and reliability are also mentioned favorably. Some have doubts about the sound.

usability, reliability, durability, price, performance

sound

68% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

This summary is based on the products: Motorola L702BT Dect_6.0 1 Accessory Handset Landline TelephoneMotorola L702BT Dect_6.0 1 Accessory Handset Landline Telephone

Dec, 2018

Expert review by : David Wise (techgearlab.com)

Motorola L702BT Review

 

Astonishingly long battery life, but that's about all it has going for it

Excellent battery life

Poor range and lacking features

All in all, we felt this phone fell short of the competition, and based on its performance in our tests, we would recommend considering alternative options.

Oct, 2016