JVC HA-S900

15 reviews

May, 2024

Positive
portability (10)
sound (7)
comfort (3)
noise isolation (3)
usability (3)

Negative
price (1)

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 15 reviews of JVC HA-S900. The average rating for this product is 4.2/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other Headphones for all reviews. People really like the design and comfort. The noise isolation and sound are also mentioned favorably, but there are some mixed views about the durability and usability. There are some less positive comments about the price.

portability, sound, noise isolation, comfort, design

price

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other Headphones the JVC HA-S900 is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 76/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 15 reviews)

Expert Reviews

User Reviews

Review Ratings

(40% of reviews)
Show all 5 star reviews (33% of reviews)
Show all 4 star reviews (27% of reviews)
Show all 3 star reviews (no reviews)
(no reviews)

Features

portability
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

sound
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

usability
Show positive (50%)Show negative (50%)(Show all)

durability
Show positive (50%)Show negative (50%)(Show all)

noise isolation
Show positive (100%)None yet(Show all)

More features

Showing 15 review(s)

Expert Reviews User Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 15 of 15 Show Reviews: in English

Consumer review (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for JVC HA-S900

alaTest has collected and analyzed 12 user reviews of JVC HA-S900 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.3/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Headphones on Amazon.com.

100% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

May, 2024

Expert review by : Jasmine France (cnet.com)

JVC HA-S900 High Grade Lightweight review

For those earbudphobic users who favor portability over features, such as active noise cancellation, there is a category of headphones that includes over-the-ear speakers and compact designs. Within that, we have JVC's line of lightweight headphones,...

The JVC HA-S900 headphones feature a lightweight design and fold-flat earcups for easy portability. A hard-shell carrying case is also included. The cushioned earpads offer decent passive sound isolation, and the overall sound quality is good.

The headband of the JVC HA-S900 headphones feels cheap, and the cable isn't long enough to use for at-home applications without an extender. The package doesn't include airplane or quarter-inch adapters.

Frequent fliers who prefer over-the-ear headphones but yearn for a portable design should consider the JVC-HA-S900, which feature good sound quality and come with a slim carrying case.

Jan, 2008

Read the full review

Expert review by : Jasmine France (cnet.com.au)

JVC HA-S900 High Grade Lightweight review: JVC HA-S900 High Grade Lightweight

JVC HA-S900 High Grade Lightweight

Frequent fliers who prefer over-the-ear headphones but yearn for a portable design should consider the JVC-HA-S900, which feature good sound quality and come with a slim carrying case.

Jan, 2008

Partner Source

Read the full review

Consumer review (newegg.com)

A great set of headphones with case

Unlike some other reviewers, I felt the cord length was just right especially when you're on the go. Even with some of the cons, I'll have to go with 5-stars since they're sub-$100.

Comfort ; Very comfortable, with its thick cushy pads it feels like pillows on your ear. Can wear for hours on end. Decent sound isolation ; Sound ; Very good quality, has a good balance of Low, Mid, High. The bass isn't booming and as deep as some...

The cord isn't that bad, but it does have a memory, that is to say it can develop kinks from being squished or folded too tightly. You really must use the traveling case to save the wear and tear on it. Also the price you pay still seems a tad high...

Dec, 2010

Read the full review