Numatic Charles CVC370-2

alaTest has collected and analyzed 21 user reviews of Numatic Charles CVC370-2 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.2/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.co.uk. Reviewers are impressed by the design and reliability. The price and usability are also appreciated. There are some mixed views about the size.

alaTest has collected and analyzed 4 user reviews of Numatic Charles CVC370-2 from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.5/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.0/5 for other products in the same category on Amazon.com. Reviewers are impressed by the usability. The design is also mentioned favorably, but there are some less positive comments about the price.

Before I had the numatic Charles vacuum I had the karcher and what a difference it makes the Charles vacuum is so much better more power and cleans much easier and better I'm a plumber so I have used it to clean sinks and blockages in the pipe line and...

great for the car I am a build and great for hooving up stones and dust very powerful aswell

I bought this hoover few days ago and it's absolutely amazing! Definitely recommend it!

"Handle is longer than I expected so less back ache when using. Powerful suction. Cleans carpet and diy mess with very little effort. Would recommend. Only downside is suction is so strong it needs a bit of effort to push along carpets but pulls no...

"Strong suction unit found it better than the others in the range"

"Pleasantly surprised by how this machine has managed to cope with excessive mortar dust from taking plaster off our flats walls and then re plastering. The amount of dust has filled the bags that came with the machine and still the suction and filters...

"Always thought these little Henry type vacuums performed really well, but never had the necessity to buy one until now. I decided to get the ‘Charles' as it as the wet capacity as well as dry. I haven't had the cause to use the wet function yet but as...