Airlive WL-2000CAM

3 reviews

Nov, 2024

General overview
Price comparison

alaTest has collected and analyzed 3 reviews of Airlive WL-2000CAM. The average rating for this product is 3.9/5, compared to an average rating of 4.0/5 for other products in the same category for all reviews.

We analyzed user and expert ratings, product age and more factors. Compared to other products in the same category the Airlive WL-2000CAM is awarded an overall alaScore™ of 72/100 = Good quality.

Review analysis

(Based on 3 reviews)

Expert Reviews

Disclaimer:

Below is a list of reviews for this or similar products. If you think this grouping is wrong please click here to flag.
Read more on our FAQ’s page.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 Show Reviews: in English | in other languages (1)

Expert review by : Frederik S (techpowerup.com)

AirLive WL-2000CAM IP Camera

The WL-2000CAM is a brand new IP camera solution from AirLive. The camera is tailored for home surveillance and even has its own lights so you can use it in a dim room. Much like the other cameras from AirLive this one has wireless capabilities and can...

Abundance of features, Relatively easy to setup, Sophisticated motion detection, Not that expensive, Comes with a good mounting kit, Wireless, Can be accessed with a 3G phone

No autofocus, No motor to cover bigger area, So so video performance

The AirLive WL-2000CAM does what it is supposed to do at a reasonable price. Compared to other cameras with the same feature set the price is not all that bad, plus it is quite easy to configure once you spend some time learning the web interface. The...

Dec, 2008

Read the full review

Expert review by : Andrew Gould (techsmart.co.za)

AirLive WL-2000CAM

The WL-2000CAM is an IP camera designed for high-level video imaging experience that generates MPEG-4 and M-JPEG streaming. With auto light sensor, its automatic night mode offers superior low light performance. It offers support for UPnP which makes...

It offers superior low light performance and you can control the amount of bandwidth it consumes.

It is a bit pricey and it doesn't offer a particularly wide viewing angle.

Jul, 2008

Read the full review