<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alaTest Blog &#187; One S</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alatest.com/blog/tag/one-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alatest.com/blog</link>
	<description>The alaTest Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 16:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	 
		<item>
		<title>The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer</title>
		<link>http://alatest.com/blog/the-big-four-wireless-carriers-and-the-devices-they-offer/</link>
		<comments>http://alatest.com/blog/the-big-four-wireless-carriers-and-the-devices-they-offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid RAZR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVO 4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alatest.com/blog/?p=4427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S.’s top cellular providers are often referred to as the “Big Four.” They consist of Verizon, AT&#38;T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, and odds are, you’re one of their subscribers. If you’re in the market for a new smartphone, you probably already know that they don’t all carry the same devices, and if you’re stuck with ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/carrier-logos.png" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4428" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/carrier-logos-300x158.png" alt="" width="180" height="95" /></a>The U.S.’s top cellular providers are often referred to as the “Big Four.” They consist of Verizon, AT&amp;T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, and odds are, you’re one of their subscribers. If you’re in the market for a new <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/c3-8/">smartphone</a>, you probably already know that they don’t all carry the same devices, and if you’re stuck with a particular carrier, you might like to know which devices are the best they have to offer.<span id="more-4427"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img class="wp-image-4429 alignright" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Verizon-Logo-300x70.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="42" /></p>
<p><strong>Verizon Wireless</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/samsung-galaxy-s3_big.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4430" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/samsung-galaxy-s3_big-265x300.jpg" alt="" width="159" height="180" /></a>Verizon, or Big Red as it’s more amicably known, plays host to a wide variety of excellent smartphones. The best device it currently has to offer (or soon to offer, really) is the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-s3/po3-134876408,8/">Samsung Galaxy S III</a>. With a 4.8-inch 720p Super AMOLED display and 1.5GHz dual-core S4 processor as well as 4G LTE connectivity, this phone is sure to be one of the hottest sellers this summer.</p>
<p>Of course, the Galaxy S III isn’t the only good choice. The<a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/motorola-droid-razr-xt910/po3-155365144,8/"> Motorola Droid RAZR</a> is a high-quality, super slim phone with many of the same features. Its processor is slightly older and only runs at 1.2GHz; however, its price tag is an agreeable $99 with contract, though you might want to consider the Droid RAZR MAXX which features a much larger battery. A Droid RAZR HD is also due sometime in the near future with beefier specs and an HD display.</p>
<p>Another notable contender is the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-google-galaxy-nexus/po3-152212898,8/">Samsung Galaxy Nexus</a>, a phone built entirely on input direct from Google and running the purest, latest version of Android. And of course, you can’t forget the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/apple-iphone-4s/po3-151144577,8/">iPhone 4S</a>, the latest of Apples iOS phones (though we suggest holding out for the iPhone 5 due later this year).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/att_logo_cx0g.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4431" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/att_logo_cx0g-300x137.jpg" alt="" width="108" height="49" /></a>AT&amp;T</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTC-One-X.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4432" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTC-One-X-300x228.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="137" /></a>AT&amp;T also has the Galaxy S III; however, it also has a very worthy alternative if you don’t want to wait for the newest Galaxy device to officially launch. The <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-x/po3-168455614,8/">HTC One X</a> is currently alaTest’s top rated phone, featuring a 4.7-inch 720p Super LCD2 display and the same 1.5GHz dual-core S4 processor found in the Galaxy S III. It also has a great 8MP camera and LTE 4G capabilities, and best of all, it’s actually available now.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T also features the iPhone 4S for the iOS aficionados out there, but again, we suggest waiting for the iPhone 5.For WP7 fans, AT&amp;T has the best WP7 device released to date – the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/nokia-lumia-900/po3-157300245,8/">Nokia Lumia 900</a>. With its 4.3-inch AMOLED display, 4G LTE, and 1.2GHz processor, it’s the fastest most feature packed WP7 phone on the market, and it’s not even the most expensive.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/sprint_testimonial_logo.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4433" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/sprint_testimonial_logo-300x123.jpg" alt="" width="126" height="52" /></a>Sprint</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTC-EVO-4G-LTE.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4434" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTC-EVO-4G-LTE-261x300.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="180" /></a>Sprint, of course, will be getting the Galaxy S III as well, but, like AT&amp;T, it has a variant of the HTC One X known as the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-evo-4g-lte/po3-169935357,8/">HTC EVO 4G LTE</a>. It’s really no different from the AT&amp;T model with the exception of a slightly different look and the fact that it’s intended for Sprint’s network.</p>
<p>Sprint’s other great choices include the iPhone 4S and the Samsung Galaxy Nexus. Unlike the Verizon Galaxy Nexus, Sprint’s is a little bit more true to the Nexus name with better Google Voice and Google Wallet integration.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/t-mobile.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4435" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/t-mobile-300x99.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="59" /></a>T-Mobile</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/htc-one-s.jpg" rel="lightbox[4427]" title="The “Big Four” Wireless Carriers and the Devices They Offer"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4436" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/htc-one-s-300x245.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="147" /></a>The Galaxy S III will be coming to T-Mobile as well, but the magenta colored carrier doesn’t have as many compelling alternatives as some of its competitors. The <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-s/po3-163069171,8/">HTC One S</a> is its only device we can really recommend, but it really is a great phone (currently ranked 3<sup>rd</sup> on our top phones list). On the inside, it’s exactly the same as its big brother, the One X, and it even features the same 1.5GHz dual-core processor found in the Galaxy S III. The only difference is its smaller 4.3-inch display featuring a slightly lower resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alatest.com/blog/the-big-four-wireless-carriers-and-the-devices-they-offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III</title>
		<link>http://alatest.com/blog/face-off-htc-one-x-vs-samsung-galaxy-s-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://alatest.com/blog/face-off-htc-one-x-vs-samsung-galaxy-s-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alaTest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid Incredible 4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVO LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alatest.com/blog/?p=4417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two new smartphones! Are you excited? We are. The HTC One X and Samsung Galaxy S III are the newest, fastest, fanciest smartphones available, but choosing one over the other isn’t an easy task. Our only option is to pit them head to head and see which comes out on top. &#160; Performance Both phones ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/GS3-v-One-X.jpg" rel="lightbox[4417]" title="Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4418" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/GS3-v-One-X-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="90" /></a>Two new <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/c3-8/">smartphones</a>! Are you excited? We are. The <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-x/po3-168455614,8/">HTC One X</a> and <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-s3/po3-134876408,8/">Samsung Galaxy S III</a> are the newest, fastest, fanciest smartphones available, but choosing one over the other isn’t an easy task. Our only option is to pit them head to head and see which comes out on top.<span id="more-4417"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/snapdragon-processor.jpg" rel="lightbox[4417]" title="Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4419" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/snapdragon-processor-300x229.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="137" /></a>Performance</strong></p>
<p>Both phones offer the best performance we’ve ever seen in a smartphone. The Galaxy S III features a 1.4GHz quad-core Exynos processor, and the One X has a 1.5GHz quad-core Tegra 3 processor. Both have their strengths and weaknesses; however, this is only true for the European versions of the phones. U.S. variants of both the One X and the Galaxy S III use the same 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor. This category is a tie.</p>
<p>Score: One X &#8211; 1; Galaxy S III – 1</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Camera</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/One-X-camera.jpg" rel="lightbox[4417]" title="Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III"><img class="wp-image-4420 alignleft" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/One-X-camera-300x168.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="101" /></a>If you use your smartphone camera often, camera quality is something worth considering. Both phones have top-notch cameras, featuring 8MP sensors with zero shutter lag; however, the One X manages to pump out just a little bit more quality in its images. The Galaxy S III does have a few extra features, such as the ability to select the “best photo” from a burst of up to 20 shots, but we feel quality is ultimately more important. This is a win for the One X, though only just.</p>
<p>Score: One X – 2; Galaxy S III – 1</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/5gnX6fnNK3SsaWJFuY1cHw3qpf39w0zI.jpg" rel="lightbox[4417]" title="Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4421" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/5gnX6fnNK3SsaWJFuY1cHw3qpf39w0zI-300x184.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="110" /></a>Features</strong></p>
<p>This is another difficult category to call a clear winner. The HTC One X has features such as Beats Audio and 25GB of Dropbox storage space, but the Galaxy S III has S-Voice (a feature similar to the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/apple-iphone-4s/po3-151144577,8/">iPhone 4S’</a> Siri) and 50GB of Dropbox space. Ultimately, it’s a tie.</p>
<p>Score: One X – 3; Galaxy S III – 2</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Display</strong></p>
<p>The One X and Galaxy S III are large phones, with 4.7 and 4.8 inch displays respectively. While they’re basically the same size (and resolution, at 720p), the technology behind them is not. The Galaxy S III uses a Super AMOLED display which is vivid and easier on your battery but sacrifices finer details and wider viewing angles. The One X has what HTC calls a Super LCD2 display which does almost the opposite – sacrifices vivid color for brightness, finer detail, and wider viewing angles. Which is better is really personal preference. This category is a tie as well.</p>
<p>Score: One X – 4; Galaxy S III – 3</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Design</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/composite.jpg" rel="lightbox[4417]" title="Face-Off: HTC One X vs. Samsung Galaxy S III"><img class="wp-image-4422 alignright" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/composite-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="180" /></a>At first glance, it appears that the One X has this category in the bag. It features a high-quality unibody design, making it sturdy and lightweight; however, it lacks a MicroSD slot, and the battery is not removable. The Galaxy S III doesn’t have that “premium” material feel, but it is still sturdy and has the bonus of a MicroSD slot and removable battery; it’s also a bit slimmer (though it doesn’t look it). Again, chalk this one up to personal preference; we’re calling it a tie.</p>
<p>Score: One X – 5; Galaxy S III – 4</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Availability</strong></p>
<p>This one is a little tricky. The Galaxy S III is currently only available in Europe, but comes to all major U.S. carriers starting June 21<sup>st</sup>. The One X is available in the U.S. now, but only with AT&amp;T and Sprint (as the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-evo-4g-lte/po3-169935357,8/">HTC Evo LTE</a>). T-Mobile and Verizon will not be getting a One X at all, though they offer the smaller but similarly equipped <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-s/po3-163069171,8/">HTC One S</a> and Droid Incredible 4G respectively.</p>
<p>Score: One X – 5; Galaxy S III – 5</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Ultimately, the match is a draw, but when making your own choice, it’s important to focus on the details. If a feature like voice recognition is high on your list, you may prefer the Galaxy S III, but if you’re an avid smartphone photographer, you’ll probably want to consider the One X. Of course, it also matters which carrier you’re with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alatest.com/blog/face-off-htc-one-x-vs-samsung-galaxy-s-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?</title>
		<link>http://alatest.com/blog/thin-is-in-what-are-the-thinnest-phones-on-the-market/</link>
		<comments>http://alatest.com/blog/thin-is-in-what-are-the-thinnest-phones-on-the-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alaTest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buying guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droid RAZR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy S III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alatest.com/blog/?p=4380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to smartphones, style is a big deal – it’s one of the reasons the iPhone is the single best selling phone on the market. Unsurprisingly, slimness is a major selling point for anyone who wants a stylish phone, but while the iPhone was the thinnest of them all for a while, it ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/oppo-thinnest-smartphone.jpg" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4381" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/oppo-thinnest-smartphone-300x169.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="81" /></a>When it comes to <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/c3-8/">smartphones</a>, style is a big deal – it’s one of the reasons the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/apple-iphone-4s/po3-151144577,8/">iPhone</a> is the single best selling phone on the market. Unsurprisingly, slimness is a major selling point for anyone who wants a stylish phone, but while the iPhone was the thinnest of them all for a while, it has become a bit of a fatty compared to current offerings (though that could change when the iPhone 5 comes out later this year). So what are today’s thinnest phones?<span id="more-4380"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/white-droid-razr.jpg" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4382" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/white-droid-razr-221x300.jpg" alt="" width="133" height="180" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/motorola-droid-razr-xt910/po3-155365144,8/">Motorola Droid RAZR</a></strong></p>
<p>Back in the pre-smartphone days, the RAZR was one of the hottest phones, thanks largely to its half-inch thickness (14mm). Now the RAZR is back, and in smartphone form, sporting Android no less. At 7.1mm thin, the Droid RAZR is currently the slimmest phone on the market, and maintaining its slim figure while sporting a 1.2GHz dual-core processor and LTE 4G capability is even more impressive. On the downside, battery life suffers considerably; however, the Droid RAZR MAXX has a much larger battery though weighs in at 8.99mm thick.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-s/po3-163069171,8/">HTC One S</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/One-S.png" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4383" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/One-S-300x236.png" alt="" width="126" height="99" /></a>At 7.8mm thin, the One S is one of the thinnest, fastest, globally available GSM smartphones on the market. Its 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor consistently posts top scores on both performance and battery benchmarks. Unlike most super thin phones, the One S actually stands a solid chance of making it through the day on a single charge.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Samsung-GALAXY-S-III-front-angle-white.jpg" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4384" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Samsung-GALAXY-S-III-front-angle-white-300x226.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="136" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-s3/po3-134876408,8/">Samsung Galaxy S III</a></strong></p>
<p>The Galaxy S III is one of the latest smartphones to hit the market, and as expected, it’s quite thin. At 8.6mm, it’s only 1mm thicker than its predecessor, the <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-i9100/po3-141755186,8/">Galaxy S II</a>, but the extra girth certainly isn’t wasted space. Sporting a 1.4GHz quad-core Exynos processor, the S III stands to be one of the fastest phones on the market. Its 2100mAh battery also bodes well for its battery life.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-google-galaxy-nexus/po3-152212898,8/">Samsung Galaxy Nexus</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/nexus.jpg" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4385" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/nexus-300x239.jpg" alt="" width="144" height="114" /></a>The Galaxy Nexus, Google’s latest “Pure Google” Android phone, is exceptionally striking with sleek lines and a unique concave display. At just 8.9mm thick, it’s also exceptionally thin. It features similar specs to the Droid RAZR (ie: 1.2GHz dual-core processor); however, it has a larger, higher resolution display. The LTE version of the Galaxy Nexus is slightly thicker in order to accommodate a larger battery.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTCOneX.jpg" rel="lightbox[4380]" title="Thin is In – What are the Thinnest Phones on the Market?"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4386" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/HTCOneX-300x226.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="136" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-x/po3-168455614,8/">HTC One X</a></strong></p>
<p>Recently displaced by the Galaxy S III as the worlds more recent smartphone, the One X is still an amazingly powerful device in a very thin shell. Its 8.9mm thickness won’t be any more noticeably thicker than the S III’s 8.6mm, but the One X has the major advantage of already being available in the U.S. Both Sprint and AT&amp;T carry it (as the EVO LTE and One X respectively). Like the S III, the One X features a powerful quad-core processor; however, some U.S. variants feature a similarly powerful dual-core instead (this may turn out to be the case for the Galaxy S III as well).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Now, there are other super thin phones on the market, such as the Sony Xperia GX, <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/huawei-ascend-p1-s/po3-158714016,8/">Huawei Ascend P1</a>, and <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/panasonic-eluga/po3-163541289,8/">Panasonic Eluga DL1</a> to name a few. We’ve selected only the most popular of them. Plus, with manufacturers like Oppo and ZTE teasing phones down to 6.2mm thin, we might have to revisit this topic in the not so distant future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alatest.com/blog/thin-is-in-what-are-the-thinnest-phones-on-the-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones</title>
		<link>http://alatest.com/blog/top-cases-for-our-top-5-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://alatest.com/blog/top-cases-for-our-top-5-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alatest.com/blog/?p=4354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphones don’t exactly come cheap, and most users expect their phone to last them about two years. Since even a short drop will almost certainly cause some unsightly cosmetic damage and potentially render a phone useless, it’s often wise to shield your smartphone with a protective case. Today, we’re taking a look at the most ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/iphone-5-cases.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4355" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/iphone-5-cases-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="90" height="90" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/c3-8/">Smartphones</a> don’t exactly come cheap, and most users expect their phone to last them about two years. Since even a short drop will almost certainly cause some unsightly cosmetic damage and potentially render a phone useless, it’s often wise to shield your smartphone with a protective case. Today, we’re taking a look at the most popular cases for our current top 5 phones.<span id="more-4354"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/One-X.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4356" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/One-X-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="180" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-x/po3-168455614,8/">HTC One X</a> and the <a href="http://www.cimousa.com/One-X-HTC/b/5368272011">Cimo S-Line Case</a></strong></p>
<p>The One X is a brand new device from HTC that has quickly risen to top of our charts. It’s currently available on AT&amp;T and Sprint (as the EVO LTE), and it will be making its way to T-Mobile in the near future. For the time being, the One X is the most powerful, feature-packed phone on the market.</p>
<p>As an affordable flexible TPU case, the S-Line is thick enough to provide some impact protection but thin enough to avoid adding too much extra bulk to the phone. It comes in a handful of colors, including black, white, and translucent. As is common with most TPU cases, it will likely show some wear after a while; however, at its current price, you could easily buy a second.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/apple-iphone-4s/po3-151144577,8/">Apple iPhone 4S</a> and the <a href="http://www.otterbox.com/iPhone-4-/-4S-Defender-Series-Case/APL2-I4SUN,default,pd.html">Otterbox Defender Series</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Otterbox.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4357" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Otterbox-e1338067075273-126x300.jpg" alt="" width="76" height="180" /></a>As the latest iteration from Apple, the iPhone 4S continues to defend its spot in the top 5. With its 3.5-inch display and large bezel, it’s starting to get left behind as the market shifts, but with a fast dual-core processor and Apple’s polished iOS, it’s still a favorite among consumers.</p>
<p>Otterbox is one of the most popular premium smartphone case manufacturers, and its Defender Series is certainly a favorite among iPhone users. It protects not only the rear of the iPhone’s fragile glass design, but also wraps around the front for additional protection. It retails for $50, which is quite a bit higher than most protective cases, but it’s possible to find it for as low as $20 fairly regularly. Just make sure to get the “new” design with larger cutout for the front facing camera.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/samsung_galaxy_note_duosuit_main_lg.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="alignright  wp-image-4358" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/samsung_galaxy_note_duosuit_main_lg-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="210" height="210" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-note/po3-147358879,8/">Samsung Galaxy Note</a> and the <a href="http://www.boxwave.com/galaxy-note-cases-and-covers/galaxy-note-duosuit/bwpdd/ppw-zvgp/">BoxWave DuoSuit</a></strong></p>
<p>Samsungls Galaxy Note has been a surprising hit, successfully filling the niche between smartphone and tablet. Its 5-inch display makes it an adequate tablet-like multimedia device, but it’s not so big that it won’t fit in your pocket for everyday use. That plus its powerful dual-core processor makes it a great phone.</p>
<p>The BoxWave DuoSuit is a flexible TPU case that comes in an assortment of colors. Ultimately, it’s an affordable case that is thin enough not to add too much bulk – because, let’s face it, the Galaxy Note is big enough already.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-google-galaxy-nexus/po3-152212898,8/">Samsung Galaxy Nexus</a> and the <a href="http://www.rearthusa.com/sprint_verizon_galaxy_nexus_slim.html">Rearth Ringke Slim</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/galaxy_nexus_4g_usa_prd.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4359" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/galaxy_nexus_4g_usa_prd-300x122.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="122" /></a>As Google’s latest “Pure Android” device, the Galaxy Nexus is a favorite among Android enthusiasts. It’s sleek design, powerful performance, and perfect integration with Google’s products also make it a favorite among smartphone users in general.</p>
<p>In order to preserve the sleek, slim look of their Galaxy Nexus, many users choose to go without a case at all; however, it’s possible to get the best of both worlds with the Rinke Slim. Its slim design adds only about 1mm of extra thickness, and it clings closely to the phone itself, mimicking its sleek lines very well.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Diztronic.jpg" rel="lightbox[4354]" title="Top Cases for our Top 5 Phones"><img class="wp-image-4360 alignright" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Diztronic-e1338067225744-162x300.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="180" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-s/po3-163069171,8/">HTC One S</a> and the <a href="http://tpu-cases.com/index.php?main_page=index&amp;cPath=48_64">Diztronic TPU Case</a></strong></p>
<p>The HTC One S is the slightly more affordable alternative to the One X. It offers just about everything the One X does but with a smaller (more notably, lower resolution) display and marginally less powerful processor.</p>
<p>As a more budget friendly device, it’s not surprising that its most popular case is budget friendly as well. Available for around $10, the Diztronic TPU case is a no-frills case that will fit snuggly and keep your precious phone protected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alatest.com/blog/top-cases-for-our-top-5-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Coolest Tech at MWC 2012</title>
		<link>http://alatest.com/blog/the-coolest-tech-at-mwc-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://alatest.com/blog/the-coolest-tech-at-mwc-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alaTest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy Beam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gigabyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MWC 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapdragon S4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alatest.com/blog/?p=3901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mobile World Congress 2012 has just wrapped up, leaving our heads spinning in the clouds as we wait for all of the newly announced products and technology to make it to consumer shelves. While MWC always has more mind-bogglingly awesome devices than we could possibly list in a short blog, there were a few items ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mwc_logo1.jpg" rel="lightbox[3901]" title="mwc_logo"><img src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mwc_logo1-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="mwc_logo" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4146" /></a>Mobile World Congress 2012 has just wrapped up, leaving our heads spinning in the clouds as we wait for all of the newly announced products and technology to make it to consumer shelves. While MWC always has more mind-bogglingly awesome devices than we could possibly list in a short blog, there were a few items that we think you should keep an eye out for as they’ll be releasing this year.<span id="more-3901"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The HTC One Series Smartphones</strong></p>
<p>HTC used MWC as a chance to announce a new line of smartphones, the One Series – three Android powered phones.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"> <a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/htc-one-series-01.jpg" rel="lightbox[3901]" title="The Coolest Tech at MWC 2012"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3903" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/htc-one-series-01-300x236.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="236" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-x/po3-168455614,8/">HTC One X</a> – Leading the pack is the One X, HTC’s new flagship smartphone. It will have a 4.7-inch 720p HD display, 1.5GHz quad-core Tegra 3 processor (possibly the dual-core Snapdragon S4 in some markets), and 32GB of internal storage. If all goes as expected, it should be available by the end of April. This is definitely a phone to keep an eye on.</p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-s/po3-163069171,8/">HTC One S</a> – The One S will be the X’s little brother, weighing in a bit lighter with a 4.3-inch qHD display. Under the hood, it will have a 1.5GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, so it ought to keep up with the X pretty well.</p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/htc-one-v/po3-163525002,8/">HTC One V</a> – Intended as an entry-level device, the One V dials things back considerably. It will have a 3.7-inch display and only a 1GHz single-core processor, but despite its lackluster specs, this has the potential to be an excellent phone, as long as they get the price right.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Nokia_808_PureView_feature_camera.png" rel="lightbox[3901]" title="The Coolest Tech at MWC 2012"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3904" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Nokia_808_PureView_feature_camera-300x264.png" alt="" width="300" height="264" /></a><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/nokia-808-pureview/po3-163054088,8/">Nokia 808 PureView</a></strong></p>
<p>When we tell you about the 808 PureView, you’re going to think we’re nuts. Basically, it’s a smartphone with a 41MP camera – no, that’s not a typo. If you’re a regular reader of our blog, you’ll know that <a href="http://alatest.com/blog/do-megapixels-really-matter/">megapixels aren’t always everything</a>, but as the PureView demonstrates, having a lot can be useful.</p>
<p>The 808 PureView actually only takes 5MP photo by default. For a smartphone, the ability to take giant 41MP photos that are typically 10MB in size isn’t exactly practical, so PureView uses the extra megapixels for a different purpose. All those extra pixels go towards things like lossless digital zoom and increased light sensitivity. This may very well be the first camra phone that can truly replace a <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/digital-compact-camera-reviews/c3-147/">point and shoot</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/cell-phone-reviews/samsung-galaxy-beam-i8520/po3-116996182,8/">Samsung Galaxy Beam</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/GALAXY_beam_Product_Image_1.jpg" rel="lightbox[3901]" title="The Coolest Tech at MWC 2012"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3905" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/GALAXY_beam_Product_Image_1-300x175.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="105" /></a>We’ve seen those pocket-sized projectors; we’ve even seen <a href="http://alatest.com/reviews/digital-compact-camera-reviews/nikon-coolpix-s1200pj/po3-146931596,147/">Nikon stick one into a camera</a>, but until now, we’ve never seen one in a phone. That’s exactly what the Galaxy Beam is, a 1GHz dual-core Android smartphone with an integrated projector. The projector unit itself only has a resolution of 640&#215;360, but can project up to a 50 inch screen.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>The Fancy New Mobile Processors</strong></p>
<p>Both Intel and Qualcomm had a strong presence at MWC this year, and both had good reason. Intel got to showcase their brand new Medfield processor in an actual production phone, the Orange* Phone, built by Gigabyte.</p>
<p><a href="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-Orange.jpg" rel="lightbox[3901]" title="The Coolest Tech at MWC 2012"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3906" src="http://alatest.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Intel-Orange-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>In its current form, Medfield is only single-core, but don’t let that fool you. It uses x86 architecture, which is considerably more efficient than ARM. In terms of performance, the single-core Medfield processor is actually on par with some quad-core ARM chips. It will be very interesting to see how they truly perform when Intel powered smartphones hit the shelves later this year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Qualcomm’s new processor is the Snapdragon S4. They’ve only so far announced dual-core versions, but quad-core variants will be out before the end of the year. But again, don’t let the core count fool you. The S4 processors showcased at MWC this year actually kept up with (and even out performed) Nvidia’s latest quad-core Tegra 3 offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alatest.com/blog/the-coolest-tech-at-mwc-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.237 seconds. -->
<!-- File not cached! Super Cache Couldn't write to: wp-content/cache/wp-cache-cf6e592a4b65109e1688ff64c42433c8.html -->
